Thinking Machines: Inkling vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare Thinking Machines: Inkling by Thinking Machines against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 131K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Thinking Machines: Inkling
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Thinking Machines: Inkling has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 6.8x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Thinking Machines: Inkling
Input
$1.00
Output
$4.05
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
9.1× cheaper
Output
$0.60
6.8× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 9.1× input, 6.8× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
42%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 13.9x more emoji
Thinking Machines: Inkling
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
57%Vocabulary56%
19wSentence Length14w
0.30Hedging0.37
5.0Bold5.7
2.7Lists4.0
0.04Emoji0.54
0.49Headings0.70
0.06Transitions0.14
Based on 27 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
