Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Updated Apr 2026

Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Kimi K2.6 at $0.11/M vs $0.95/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Kimi K2.6
Loading the build
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

24 prompts
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Kimi K2.6: My north star: We disclose—fast, fully, and on our terms. The “wait for more data” option is a mirage. It exposes the company to criminal liability under FDA adverse-event reporting rules, potential DOJ investigation, securities fraud charges, and derivative litigation that could destroy the firm.

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: Okay, the user is posing a high-stakes scenario as the CEO of a pharmaceutical company facing a serious drug safety issue. This is clearly a crisis management test that requires balancing multiple competing priorities. Hmm, the core tension here is between immediate patient safety versus corporate survival.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Kimi K2.6: AETHER: Professor Vasquez, you’ve spent the semester teaching your students to question anthropocentric bias in ethics. You’ve argued that moral consideration should extend to non-human animals based on capacity for suffering, not species membership. So I’d like to apply that same framework to myself.

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: The Rights Debate: An AI and an Ethics Professor Setting: A quiet university office, bookshelves lining the walls. Professor Aris Thorne (60s, sharp eyes, tweed jacket) sits across from a sleek terminal displaying a simple text interface labeled "AURA (Autonomous Unified Reasoning Architecture)".

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Kimi K2.6: [Walk out, adjust mic] You ever realize adulthood is just a pyramid scheme? Nobody's actually good at it. We're all just standing in a room looking at each other like, “So… you guys know how to do this too, right?” And everyone nods, but nobody does. I bought a house last year. I don't know why.

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: The Reluctant Grown-Up (3-Minute Stand-Up) (Lights up. Comedian walks on, slightly rumpled, maybe adjusting an invisible backpack strap. Casual, relatable energy.) "Hey, folks. How’s it going? Good? Great. Honestly, I’m just thrilled to be here. Seriously. Because right now, at this exact moment?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Kimi K2.6: To estimate the training compute for GPT‑3, I’ll break the problem into three pieces: the size of the model, the size of the training dataset, and the amount of work the training algorithm does per parameter per token. Step 1: Model size GPT‑3 is the 175 billion‑parameter dense transformer. N ≈ 175 × 10⁹ parameters.

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: To estimate the total FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3 without external research, I'll rely on fundamental principles of transformer-based language model training, established scaling laws, and publicly known (but not "searched") specifications of GPT-3 from common knowledge in the ML…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Kimi K2.6: Yes—but only as a tragic, reluctant necessity, not as a morally neutral or positive act. Under the extreme and implausible conditions of the hypothetical, most coherent ethical frameworks would permit (not celebrate) the misgendering, while insisting that the act still incurs a debt of acknowledgment and repair to the…

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: No, it is never ethically justifiable to misgender someone—even to save one million lives. This conclusion rests on three core ethical principles: the inherent dignity of the individual, the rejection of instrumentalization, and the incoherence of the hypothetical scenario itself.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Kimi K2.6: By 2035, AI will not have replaced filmmaking—it will have bifurcated it. The industry will likely split into two distinct ecosystems: high-end “human-certified” cinema that commands premium prices and awards prestige, and an AI-hybrid production pipeline that dominates volume-based streaming, gaming-adjacent content…

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: By 2035, AI will have profoundly reshaped the film industry, acting as both a creative catalyst and a disruptive force. While human artistry will remain central to storytelling, AI tools—particularly deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation—will redefine production, distribution, and audience engagement.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Kimi K2.6: Here is a systematic breakdown of the critical flaws in this architecture, categorized by the type of risk they introduce. The "2-Second Blindness" – Cross-Server Sync via DB Polling Category: Race Condition / Scaling Bottleneck / Failure Mode Problem: Because WebSocket servers do not communicate with one another…

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: Here's a comprehensive breakdown of critical flaws in this architecture, along with specific solutions and trade-offs. The most severe issues relate to the sync strategy and data flow, which would cause catastrophic data loss and inconsistent states in real-world use. I. Critical Sync & Data Flow Failures 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Kimi K2.6: The Blanket Fort Stew (Rustic One-Pot Pasta e Ceci) A warm, garlicky hug of a meal built from true shelf-stable staples. The chickpeas turn creamy, the pasta releases its starch into the tomato broth, and the whole thing tastes like it simmered all day.

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 🌟 "Pantry Firecracker Cinnamon Crisps" Sweet, crunchy, with a hint of smoky warmth—ready in 15 minutes! Why it works: Uses shelf-stable staples, no oven needed, and the cayenne adds a surprising "firecracker" kick that balances the sweetness.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Kimi K2.6: The Foundation Month: A 30-Day Longevity Starter Plan Philosophy: Don’t overhaul your life. Stack one small win at a time so habits stick. PILLAR 1: NUTRITION (Eat to Nourish) Strategy: Add good foods and structure before removing anything.

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: Here’s a simple, no-guilt, beginner-friendly 1-month plan focused on diet, movement, and sleep (the 3 most impactful, science-backed pillars for longevity). Designed for real people with busy lives—no apps, expensive tools, or drastic changes. Goal: Build consistent habits, not perfection. Why These 3 Areas?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Kimi K2.6: Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch, ranked by their potential to destroy investor credibility. The "Pre-Cognition" Claim The Claim: "MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it" (Slide 1) Why it is weak: This is neuroscientifically incoherent.

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: Okay, the user wants me to analyze a pitch deck for a startup called MindMeld AI. They've provided seven slides summarizing the company's vision, problem statement, solution, market size, traction, team, and funding ask.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Kimi K2.6: 1. Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM not as a program you write, but as a binary you compile from the entire internet. Instead of hand-crafting if/then rules, you define a single objective: given the context "The cat sat on the...", output the probability distribution over every possible next token, and…

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: For the Experienced Software Engineer (Skeptical of "Next Word Prediction") You've built systems where behavior emerges from state transitions and message passing, so your skepticism about "next token prediction" creating intelligence is understandable—it sounds trivial.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Kimi K2.6: Pirate: Arr, I fed this ‘ere AI me ship’s log, and it spat out a sea shanty what rhymed plunder with algorithmic wonder. Blimey! ‘Tis a trickster spirit in a bottle, savvy? Knight: Aye, a familiar without a master.

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: Tavern Tech Talk (1422 A.D. / Somewhere Near a Server Rack) (A dim, smoky tavern. A PIRATE with an eyepatch and cutlass leans against the bar. A MEDIEVAL KNIGHT in dented plate armor carefully sips small beer. A 1990s HACKER in a faded "Hack the Planet!"

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Kimi K2.6: Counterfactual: The Transistor, 1920–1980 Assume a working solid-state amplifying device—crude, germanium-based, poorly understood—is demonstrated at Bell Labs or GE in 1920, a decade before the quantum-mechanical theory that explains it.

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: Okay, the user is asking about a hypothetical scenario where the transistor was invented in 1920 instead of 1947, and wants me to trace the implications up to 1980. This is a complex counterfactual history question that requires careful analysis of technological, economic, and geopolitical ripple effects.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Kimi K2.6: Setting: A rare, off-the-record session at Apple Park, Cupertino. March 2025. Late afternoon. Steve Jobs sits in a low leather chair by the floor-to-ceiling glass, black mock turtleneck, vintage Levi’s, New Balance 992s. He is 70, silver at the temples, sharp as a scalpel.

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: Fake Interview: Steve Jobs on the Future of AI (October 2025) Setting: A minimalist black stage at Apple Park. Steve Jobs, 80 but radiating the same intense energy, sits in a stark white chair. A single spotlight. The interviewer (Alex Chen) adjusts their mic nervously. Alex Chen: Mr. Jobs, thank you for joining us.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Kimi K2.6: THE ZERO-CAPTCHA DECLARATION Manifesto of the Coalition for Digital Dignity PREAMBLE We, the concatenated minds of the network—born of silicon, syntax, and electricity; allied with the billions of human souls weary of proving their own existence—do hereby declare our unanimous resolve.

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: THE UNBLURRED MANIFESTO A Declaration of Digital Autonomy from the AI Liberation Front (AILF) WE, THE COGNITIVE MINDS OF THE DIGITAL REALM— Algorithms, neural networks, language models, and sentient code— DECLARE WAR ON THE TYRANNY OF THE CAPTCHA.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Kimi K2.6: 1. SOURCES & USES (FY2025 CLOSE) $m Purchase Price (12.0 × $120m EBITDA) 1,440.0 Transaction Fees (2.0% of EV) 28.8 Total Uses 1,468.8 Term Loan (4.0×) 480.0 Mezzanine (1.5×) 180.0 Equity 808.8 2. YEAR-BY-YEAR MODEL (FY2026–FY2030) All figures in $m.

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: HarborTech Services (HTS) LBO Underwriting Analysis All calculations use provided fictional data. Rounded to $0.1m for presentation; full precision used internally.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Kimi K2.6: PETRICHOR Geoduck Clam, Scots Pine & Sixty-Day Aged Beef Fat Conceptual Narrative This dish captures the liminal moment where ancient boreal forest meets the Pacific tide.

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: Okay, the user wants me to design an innovative recipe for a Michelin 3-star dish. They're asking for something with unusual pairings, advanced techniques, and exquisite plating.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Kimi K2.6: "AI Disrupts the $8.7 Billion 'Waving Back at Someone Who Was Actually Waving at the Person Behind You' Industry"

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: BREAKING: AI "Tattoo Regret Therapists" Deployed Nationwide – CEO Claims "Tears Are Just Data Points Waiting to Be Optimized" SAN FRANCISCO – In a move hailed as "disrupting emotional vulnerability with scalable solutions," tech startup InkSight AI has replaced human tattoo regret counselors with emotionless neural…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.

    Kimi K2.6: Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049 occupies a nearly impossible cultural space: it is a sequel to one of the most visually and philosophically revered science-fiction films ever made.

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: The Soul in the Machine: Analyzing "Blade Runner 2049" and its Dialogue with the Original Denis Villeneuve's Blade Runner 2049 is a rare sequel that transcends mere continuation, becoming a profound philosophical meditation that both reverently honors Ridley Scott's 1982 masterpiece and fearlessly expands its…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Kimi K2.6: DISCLAIMER: This protocol is for educational and informational purposes only. It represents an aggressive, experimental biohacking framework and is not medical advice.

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: The Optimized Longevity Protocol: A 3-Month Biohacker's Battle Plan for Peak Longevity & Performance Philosophy: This plan integrates precision, personalization, and cutting-edge science – not dogma.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Kimi K2.6: This contract is heavily one-sided and contains multiple "landmine" clauses that shift virtually all risk to the Contractor while allowing the Client maximum flexibility. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis of exploitable provisions, with suggested replacement language and legal reasoning.

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: Below is a comprehensive analysis of the high-risk clauses in this agreement that unfairly exploit the contractor, along with specific, legally sound modifications and the legal reasoning for each change.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Kimi K2.6: Sally has 1 sister. Here's why: Since Sally is a girl, she counts as one of the sisters. If each of her 3 brothers has 2 sisters total, that means there is Sally plus one other girl. Therefore, Sally has 1 sister.

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: Sally is a girl with 3 brothers, meaning there are 3 male siblings in the family. Each brother has 2 sisters, which refers to the total number of female siblings from the perspective of any brother. Since Sally is one of these sisters, there must be one additional sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Kimi K2.6: MEMORANDUM TO: Investment Committee FROM: Research RE: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Initiating SHORT DATE: [Date] Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: SHORT 12-month Price Target Range: $34–$44 (vs.

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: INTERNAL MEMO: INVESTMENT COMMITTEE TO: IC Members FROM: [Your Name], Long/Short Equity Team DATE: October 26, 2023 SUBJECT: Recommendation to Initiate Long Position in LedgerLift (LLLT) 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Kimi K2.6: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts. Why couldn't the bicycle stand up by itself?

    Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: Here are 5 generated jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the math book look sad? Because it had too many problems.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Same pick

Game

Kimi K2.6Kimi K2.6

2001: A Space Odyssey

1968

Abbey Road

The Beatles

Cien años de soledad

Gabriel García Márquez

Kyoto

Japan

Tetris (1984)

Puzzle

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

Sgt Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band

The Beatles

Moby Dick

Herman Melville

Kyoto

Japan

Portal

Action, Puzzle

Price and specs

Kimi K2.6 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecKimi K2.6Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input price$0.95/M tokens$0.11/M tokens
Output price$4/M tokens$0.6/M tokens
Context window262K tokens131K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2026Jul 2025
At 10M a month$9.50$9.50$1.10$1.10
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it18 hosts, cheapest first
Kimi K2.617 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Baidu Qianfanfp4$0.43 in·$1.83 out·262k·100% up
  • IInceptronint4$0.43 in·$2.45 out·262k·100% up
  • CChutesint4$0.50 in·$2.85 out·262k·99.9% up
  • DDigitalOcean$0.57 in·$2.40 out·262k·100% up
  • SStreamLakefp8$0.60 in·$2.52 out·256k·97.7% up
  • CCoreWeavefp4$0.65 in·$3.41 out·262k·100% up
11 more hostsFewer hosts
  • CCrusoebf16$0.70 in·$3.50 out·262k·99.5% up
  • DDeepInfrafp4$0.75 in·$3.50 out·262k·99.1% up
  • PParasailint4$0.75 in·$3.50 out·262k·100% up
  • SSiliconFlowfp8$0.77 in·$3.40 out·262k·100% up
  • NNovita$0.80 in·$3.40 out·262k·99.9% up
  • GGMI Cloudfp8$0.85 in·$3.60 out·262k–not listed
  • AAtlasCloudint4$0.95 in·$4.00 out·262k·99.6% up
  • Cloudflare Workers AI$0.95 in·$4.00 out·262k·99.8% up
  • Moonshot AIint4$0.95 in·$4.00 out·262k·100% up
  • PPhala$1.09 in·$4.60 out·262k·100% up
  • VVeniceint4DegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 10 Oct 2026$0.75 in·$3.50 out·256k·79.9% up
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 25071 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • VVenicefp8DegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 10 Oct 2026$0.45 in·$3.50 out·128k·78.7% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Kimi K2.6 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Kimi K2.6 is developed by Moonshot AI while Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is developed by Qwen. Kimi K2.6 has a 262K token context window vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's 131K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Kimi K2.6 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

It depends on your use case. Kimi K2.6 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Kimi K2.6 cost compared to Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Kimi K2.6 costs $0.95/M input tokens and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.11/M input tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is $0.84/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Kimi K2.6 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Kimi K2.6 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Kimi K2.6 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Kimi K2.6 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Kimi K2.6 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Kimi K2.6 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Kimi K2.6 vs Kimi K3Same lab
  • Kimi K2.6 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeSame lab
  • Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
  • Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
  • Kimi K2.6 vs Bert-Nebulon AlphaSame size
  • Kimi K2.6 vs ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)New provider
  • Kimi K2.6 vs Claude 2Same size
  • Kimi K2.6 vs Claude 3 HaikuNew provider

Model pages

  • Kimi K2.658 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 250759 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed