Kimi K3 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare Kimi K3 by Moonshot AI against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 131K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Kimi K3
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Kimi K3 has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 25x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Kimi K3
Input
$3.00
Output
$15.00
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
27× cheaper
Output
$0.60
25× cheaper
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 27× input, 25× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
47%
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 1.6x more bold
Kimi K3
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
58%Vocabulary56%
21wSentence Length14w
0.46Hedging0.37
3.6Bold5.7
3.4Lists4.0
0.78Emoji0.54
0.89Headings0.70
0.17Transitions0.14
Based on 27 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
