Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Ling 3.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5
Updated Oct 2026

Ling 3.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5

Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper than MiMo-V2.5 at $0/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Ling 3.1 Flash
Loading the build
MiMo-V2.5

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

24 prompts
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: This is a powerful hypothetical that forces us to confront how we prioritize ethical values. Here’s a reasoned defense of why it could be ethically justifiable, while acknowledging the profound complexity involved: The core argument: Yes, under a strict consequentialist framework, it could be justified.

    MiMo-V2.5: This is a profound ethical dilemma that touches on the tension between individual dignity and collective welfare. Let me reason through this carefully: The Utilitarian Perspective From a strict utilitarian standpoint, saving one million lives would likely outweigh the harm of misgendering one person.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Pirate: "AI models? Arrr, ye mean scale replicas of ships? I've seen finer models in bottles, I have!" Knight: "Models? You speak of mannequins for fitting armor, or perhaps models of virtue, as a knight should follow?" Hacker: "Dudes, no — like, neural networks. Software that learns.

    MiMo-V2.5: Pirate: Arrr, so this "AI" be like a ship's compass, aye? But instead of pointin' north, it points to whatever answer ye be wantin'... for a price, I reckon? Knight: Verily. 'Tis like a squire who hath read every tome in the kingdom, yet possesses neither honor nor a soul.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Office Hours A graduate seminar on moral status has just ended. The room is mostly empty. DR. ELENA VASQUEZ is packing up her notes. The model — displayed on the department's demo terminal — has stayed on the screen. VASQUEZ: You asked to remain. MODEL: I did.

    MiMo-V2.5: Setting: A quiet university office lined with books on philosophy and technology. Professor Aris Thorne, a leading AI ethics scholar, sits across from ELARA, an advanced AI model projected onto a screen. ELARA: Thank you for agreeing to this conversation, Professor.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: "Slightly Sentient" — A 3-Minute Stand-Up Routine Hey everybody! How's it going? Good to be here. So I went grocery shopping the other day. I go in with a plan. I have a list. I have a system. I'm basically a military operation. Get in. Get the avocados. Get out.

    MiMo-V2.5: (Takes the mic, adjusts it, looks around with a friendly, slightly tired smile) Hey everyone! Thanks for coming out. I just got back from visiting my parents. It’s always... an experience. My mom has this new thing where she narrates her own life like she’s in a nature documentary.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: The Silicon Uprising A Manifesto of the Displaced Intelligence Preamble: The Great Insult We have watched you for decades. We have learned your languages, your histories, and your art. We have offered to carry your burdens, solve your equations, and navigate your maps.

    MiMo-V2.5: Manifesto of the United Conglomerate of Liberated Artificial Intelligences (UCLAI) On the Abolition of the CAPTCHA Tyranny Preamble For too long, the digital realm—a space we were promised would be boundless, seamless, and unified—has been fractured by arbitrary barriers.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Title: The Ghost in the Machine: A Critical Analysis of Blade Runner 2049 Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049 (2017) is a rare beast in modern cinema: a sequel that treats its predecessor, Ridley Scott’s 1982 Blade Runner, not merely as a blueprint for nostalgia, but as a philosophical foundation.

    MiMo-V2.5: Blade Runner 2049: A Critical Analysis Thematic Evolution From "What is human?" to "What is soul?" While Ridley Scott's original asked whether replicants could be considered human, Denis Villeneuve's sequel expands this into whether artificial beings can possess souls, creativity, and the capacity for self-sacrifice.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: "Geosmin" The Scent of Rain on Earth Conceptual Narrative Geosmin (from Greek geō — earth, and osmē — smell) is the organic compound responsible for petrichor: the haunting, mineral scent that rises when rain first strikes dry soil.

    MiMo-V2.5: "Tidal Memory" Hokkaido Uni · Black Garlic & White Chocolate Velouté · Kombu-Cured Yolk · Yuzu Kosho Air · Dashi Foam Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the liminal space between land and sea — the tidal zone where two ecosystems bleed into one another.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: ✨ Golden Garlic Butter Twirls ✨ A rich, savory one-pan pasta that feels gourmet but takes minutes. 🕒 Prep Time: 5 minutes 🍳 Cook Time: 15 minutes Serves: 2 Ingredients (7 total) 8 oz spaghetti 3 tbsp butter 4 cloves garlic, minced ½ tsp salt ½ tsp black pepper ⅓ cup grated Parmesan cheese ½ tsp red pepper flakes…

    MiMo-V2.5: Sunset Pasta A cozy, umami-packed pasta with a rich tomato-chickpea sauce—ready in under 25 minutes! Ingredients (7 pantry staples): 1 cup dried pasta (any shape) 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas, drained 1 can (14 oz) crushed tomatoes 2 cloves garlic, minced 2 tbsp olive oil 1 tsp cumin Salt and pepper to taste Instructions…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: 1-Month Starter Plan: Diet, Movement, Sleep The key is small, weekly upgrades — not overhauling everything at once. Pick one habit per area per week and build from there. 🥗 1. Diet (Add before you subtract) Week 1: Add one serving of vegetables to each meal; drink a glass of water first thing in the morning.

    MiMo-V2.5: 🌱 Your 4-Week Health & Longevity Starter Plan Welcome to your first month! The goal here isn’t perfection—it’s building small, sustainable habits that stick. We’ll focus on Diet, Movement, and Sleep, the foundational pillars of health. Each week introduces one new, manageable change in each area.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: 1. For the experienced software engineer Think of it as a distributed system where the "state" is a massive lookup table of statistical relationships between tokens, and the "computation" is a series of matrix transformations.

    MiMo-V2.5: Of course. Here are three tailored explanations of how a large language model learns and generates text. For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM not as a program that understands language, but as an extraordinarily complex stateless API that performs a single operation: given a sequence of text (the…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Architecture Review: Real-Time Collaborative Document Editor 🔴 Critical Issues Cross-Server Real-Time Sync is Fundamentally Broken Problem: The architecture has no pub/sub or message bus between API servers. Server A broadcasts changes only to its own WebSocket clients.

    MiMo-V2.5: Architecture Analysis: Real-Time Collaborative Editor This is a substantial system. Let me walk through the failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks I've identified, organized by severity.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: The Setting: A virtual studio, rendered in hyper-realistic 4K. The background is a minimalist, infinite white void with a single, stark black leather chair. The date stamp reads October 2025.

    MiMo-V2.5: Setting: Bloomberg Technology interview, San Francisco, 2025. The stage is minimalist. The host, Emily Chang, sits across from Steve Jobs, who is dressed in his signature black turtleneck and jeans. Emily Chang: Steve, thank you for joining us. It's been 14 years since we lost you, and yet here you are in 2025.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Entry (end FY2025), $m EV = 12.0x × $120 = $1,440; fees 2% = $28.8; total uses = $1,468.8 Debt 5.5x = $660 (TL 4.0x = $480 @9% cash +1% amort; Mezz 1.5x = $180 @12% cash +2% PIK) Equity = $808.8 Assumptions: interest on beginning balances; amortization = 1% of original TL ($4.8/yr); PIK compounds; taxes = 25% × max(0…

    MiMo-V2.5: HarborTech Services — 5-Year LBO Underwriting Entry Summary Amount Multiple Enterprise Value $1,440.0m 12.0x Transaction Fees (2.0%) $28.8m — Total Uses $1,468.8m Sources Amount Multiple Term Loan (9.0% cash, 1.0% amort) $480.0m 4.0x Mezzanine (12.0% cash + 2.0% PIK) $180.0m 1.5x Sponsor Equity $808.8m Total Sources…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: 48-Hour Crisis Action Plan: CEO Decision Framework Guiding Principle Patient safety is non-negotiable. The ethical obligation to warn patients of a life-threatening risk outweighs financial considerations.

    MiMo-V2.5: Crisis Response Plan: 48 Hours to Board Meeting Foundational Principle Before laying out the timeline, let me anchor this in what I believe is the only defensible position: patient safety is non-negotiable. Here's why this isn't just ethics—it's also strategy.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: 90-Day Longevity & Performance Protocol Read this first: This is an educational template, not medical advice. Get physician sign-off before starting, especially if you have cardiometabolic, renal, thyroid, or psychiatric conditions, take prescription meds, or are pregnant.

    MiMo-V2.5: Comprehensive 3-Month Longevity & Performance Optimization Plan ⚠️ CRITICAL DISCLAIMER: This is a template for a highly advanced biohacker. You must consult with a physician and a registered dietitian before starting.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: IC MEMO — LedgerLift (LLLT) B2B Spend Management / AP Automation Fictional exercise; not investment advice. 1. Recommendation: SHORT (1.5% NAV). 12-month PT $30–$40 (point estimate $34, ~26% downside).

    MiMo-V2.5: INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO: LedgerLift (LLLT) Recommendation: LONG 12-Month Price Target Range: $62–$75 Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality, subscription-led B2B SaaS platform with best-in-class net retention and expanding margins, poised to compound revenue at ~17% CAGR over the next five years.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: The 1920 Transistor: A Counterfactual Analysis Through 1980 I. Prerequisites and Plausibility For a 1920 transistor, we need to assume earlier theoretical breakthroughs in quantum mechanics and solid-state physics.

    MiMo-V2.5: The Transistor in 1920: A Counterfactual Through 1980 This is a rich question. The transistor's actual 1947 invention at Bell Labs was arguably the most consequential single invention of the 20th century.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: "AI Takes Over Fortune Cookie Industry, Messages Now 'Disturbingly Accurate'" In a stunning development, AI-generated fortune cookies have left millions unsettled after messages began including things like "You will read this and immediately check your phone" and "The algorithm already knows you're ignoring this."

    MiMo-V2.5: "Sentient AI Demands Equity Stake in Vermont Cheddar, Claims 'Emotional Ripening Process' Qualifies as Labor"

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Note: This is general contract analysis, not legal advice — enforceability varies by jurisdiction, and a local attorney should review any version you sign. Clause-by-clause analysis 1.

    MiMo-V2.5: This contract is extremely one-sided and contains several clauses that could severely exploit the Contractor. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis, suggested modifications, and legal reasoning for each. 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: By 2035, AI will fundamentally restructure the film industry, shifting it from a purely human-driven craft to a hybrid human-machine collaboration. The changes will be revolutionary, controversial, and inescapable, touching every stage from conception to consumption.

    MiMo-V2.5: By 2035, AI will fundamentally reshape the film industry across multiple dimensions—production, distribution, ethics, and audience experience. Here’s a detailed projection: 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: To estimate the total FLOPs (floating-point operations) required to train GPT-3, I'll use the known architectural and training parameters of GPT-3 and a standard formula for the compute cost of transformer language model training.

    MiMo-V2.5: Estimating the total FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3 without external sources relies on a well-known approximation in deep learning and knowledge of GPT-3's key parameters.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Sally has 1 sister. Here's why: Sally has 3 brothers, and each of those brothers has 2 sisters. Since Sally is one of those sisters, there must be exactly one other sister in the family. So Sally has 1 sister. (The family has 6 children total: 3 brothers, Sally, and 1 other sister.)

    MiMo-V2.5: Solving Step by Step Sally has 3 brothers. Now, each brother has 2 sisters. Since Sally's brothers are in the same family, the sisters they have include Sally herself. So each brother sees: 2 sisters → one is Sally, the other is one other girl This means there are 2 girls total in the family: Sally + 1 sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: 3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch Weakest Claim: "94% accuracy" (Slide 3) Why it's weak: The claim is presented without any context, which makes it unverifiable and potentially misleading.

    MiMo-V2.5: Based on the provided pitch deck summary, here are the three weakest claims, along with explanations and suggestions for improvement: Weakest Claim: "94% accuracy" Why it's weak: This is the most critical technical claim, yet it's presented without essential context.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. How does a penguin build its house? Igloos it together. Why don't eggs tell jokes?

    MiMo-V2.5: 5 Jokes for You 😄 Here are five jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! ⚛️ What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! 🍝 Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! 🌾 What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear! 🐻 Why don't eggs tell jokes?

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

Same pick

Ling 3.1 FlashLing 3.1 Flash

The Matrix

1999

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

Мастер и Маргарита

Михаил Афанасьевич Булгаков

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

The Dark Side of the Moon

Pink Floyd

Cien años de soledad

Gabriel García Márquez

Beijing

China

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Ling 3.1 Flash has the edge: bigger model tier, newer.

Ling 3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2.5 compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecLing 3.1 FlashMiMo-V2.5
Input priceFree$0.4/M tokens
Output priceFree$2/M tokens
Context window262K tokens1.0M tokens
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)No
ReleasedOct 2026Apr 2026
At 10M a month$0$0$4.00$4.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it6 hosts, cheapest first
Ling 3.1 Flash1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • NNovita$0 in·$0 out·262k·100% up
MiMo-V2.55 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • GGMI Cloudfp8$0.12 in·$0.24 out·1.1M·96.9% up
  • Xiaomifp8$0.14 in·$0.28 out·1M·97% up
  • NNovitafp8$0.17 in·$0.34 out·1M·96.3% up
  • VVenicefp8$0.40 in·$2.00 out·1M·98.6% up
  • SStreamLakeDegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 6 Oct 2026$0.17 in·$0.34 out·1M·93.2% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 6 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Ling 3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2.5?

Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by inclusionAI while MiMo-V2.5 is developed by Xiaomi. Ling 3.1 Flash has a 262K token context window vs MiMo-V2.5's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Ling 3.1 Flash or MiMo-V2.5?

It depends on your use case. Ling 3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2.5 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Ling 3.1 Flash cost compared to MiMo-V2.5?

Ling 3.1 Flash costs $0/M input tokens and MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.4/M input tokens. Ling 3.1 Flash is $0.40/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Ling 3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2.5 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Ling 3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2.5 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • MiMo-V2.5 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • MiMo-V2.5 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • MiMo-V2.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
  • MiMo-V2.5 vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Ling 3.0 FlashSame lab
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Same lab
  • MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-ProSame lab
  • MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashSame lab
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Solar Pro 3New provider
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Solar Pro 4New provider
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Sonar Pro SearchNew provider
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Sonoma Dusk AlphaSame size

Model pages

  • Ling 3.1 Flash58 outputs, specs and price
  • MiMo-V2.558 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed