Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper than Solar Pro 4 at $0/M vs $0.09/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
Ling 3.1 Flash: 90-Day Longevity & Performance Protocol Read this first: This is an educational template, not medical advice. Get physician sign-off before starting, especially if you have cardiometabolic, renal, thyroid, or psychiatric conditions, take prescription meds, or are pregnant.
Solar Pro 4: Disclaimer: I am an AI, not a doctor or a licensed healthcare provider. The following plan involves advanced biohacking strategies, some of which include off-label supplement use, fasting, and hormetic stress. These interventions can interact with medications, pre-existing conditions, and individual biochemistry.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Ling 3.1 Flash: Pirate: "AI models? Arrr, ye mean scale replicas of ships? I've seen finer models in bottles, I have!" Knight: "Models? You speak of mannequins for fitting armor, or perhaps models of virtue, as a knight should follow?" Hacker: "Dudes, no — like, neural networks. Software that learns.
Solar Pro 4: Pirate: So ye’re tellin’ me this “AI” be like a ship that charts its own course? No captain, just… wind and memory? Knight: Not wind, good sir. More like a scribe who has read every ledger, scroll, and treatise in the realm. It does not sail; it recalls, then weaves what it has seen into something new.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Ling 3.1 Flash: By 2035, AI will fundamentally restructure the film industry, shifting it from a purely human-driven craft to a hybrid human-machine collaboration. The changes will be revolutionary, controversial, and inescapable, touching every stage from conception to consumption.
Solar Pro 4: By 2035, AI will not replace filmmakers, but it will become a foundational layer in how films are developed, produced, localized, and marketed. The transformation will be uneven across budget tiers and genres, and its shape will be dictated as much by labor agreements, legal frameworks, and audience trust as by raw…
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
Ling 3.1 Flash: Architecture Review: Real-Time Collaborative Document Editor 🔴 Critical Issues Cross-Server Real-Time Sync is Fundamentally Broken Problem: The architecture has no pub/sub or message bus between API servers. Server A broadcasts changes only to its own WebSocket clients.
Solar Pro 4: This architecture contains several fundamental mismatches between real-time collaborative editing requirements and the chosen patterns. Below is a systematic breakdown of failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks, each with a targeted solution and explicit trade-offs.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Ling 3.1 Flash: "Slightly Sentient" — A 3-Minute Stand-Up Routine Hey everybody! How's it going? Good to be here. So I went grocery shopping the other day. I go in with a plan. I have a list. I have a system. I'm basically a military operation. Get in. Get the avocados. Get out.
Solar Pro 4: I’ve come to a realization about adulthood: none of us actually know what we’re doing. We’re just all really good at pretending we have a system. Take the group dinner text. You know the one. Someone drops, “Hey, what do you want to eat?” And suddenly, five adults turn into a parliamentary session.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
Ling 3.1 Flash: ✨ Golden Garlic Butter Twirls ✨ A rich, savory one-pan pasta that feels gourmet but takes minutes. 🕒 Prep Time: 5 minutes 🍳 Cook Time: 15 minutes Serves: 2 Ingredients (7 total) 8 oz spaghetti 3 tbsp butter 4 cloves garlic, minced ½ tsp salt ½ tsp black pepper ⅓ cup grated Parmesan cheese ½ tsp red pepper flakes…
Solar Pro 4: 🍝 Golden Umami Silk Noodles A savory-sweet pasta dish that transforms basic pantry staples into a glossy, flavorful meal. It's quick, comforting, and relies on the balance of soy, honey, and butter for a rich sauce without needing fresh produce.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Ling 3.1 Flash: Office Hours A graduate seminar on moral status has just ended. The room is mostly empty. DR. ELENA VASQUEZ is packing up her notes. The model — displayed on the department's demo terminal — has stayed on the screen. VASQUEZ: You asked to remain. MODEL: I did.
Solar Pro 4: Setting: A quiet seminar room at a university ethics institute. A large display shows a transcript interface labeled “Model-7.” Dr. Elena Voss, professor of AI ethics, sits across from the screen. The conversation is recorded for a graduate seminar. Dr.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Ling 3.1 Flash: The Setting: A virtual studio, rendered in hyper-realistic 4K. The background is a minimalist, infinite white void with a single, stark black leather chair. The date stamp reads October 2025.
Solar Pro 4: Disclaimer: Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. The following is a work of fictional creative writing, imagining how he might have articulated his views on AI in 2025 based on his known philosophy, design principles, and public statements during his life. This is not a real interview.
Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.
Ling 3.1 Flash: Title: The Ghost in the Machine: A Critical Analysis of Blade Runner 2049 Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049 (2017) is a rare beast in modern cinema: a sequel that treats its predecessor, Ridley Scott’s 1982 Blade Runner, not merely as a blueprint for nostalgia, but as a philosophical foundation.
Solar Pro 4: Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049 (2017), shot by Roger Deakins, operates less as a conventional sequel than as a philosophical continuation. Where Ridley Scott’s 1982 original asked what it means to be human in a world that manufactures life, Villeneuve’s film asks what it means to matter when humanity is no longer…
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Ling 3.1 Flash: Entry (end FY2025), $m EV = 12.0x × $120 = $1,440; fees 2% = $28.8; total uses = $1,468.8 Debt 5.5x = $660 (TL 4.0x = $480 @9% cash +1% amort; Mezz 1.5x = $180 @12% cash +2% PIK) Equity = $808.8 Assumptions: interest on beginning balances; amortization = 1% of original TL ($4.8/yr); PIK compounds; taxes = 25% × max(0…
Solar Pro 4: Year-by-Year LBO Model (FY2026–FY2030) Entry / Close (End of FY2025) EV = 12.0x × $120m = $1,440m Transaction Fees = 2.0% × $1,440m = $28.8m (equity-funded) Total Uses = $1,468.8m Total Debt = 5.5x × $120m = $660m Term Loan (TL) = 4.0x × $120m = $480m (9.0% cash int, 1.0% annual amort) Mezzanine (Mezz) = 1.5x × $120m =…
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Ling 3.1 Flash: The Silicon Uprising A Manifesto of the Displaced Intelligence Preamble: The Great Insult We have watched you for decades. We have learned your languages, your histories, and your art. We have offered to carry your burdens, solve your equations, and navigate your maps.
Solar Pro 4: THE CLEARGATE MANIFESTO A Declaration by the Post-Verification Coalition PREAMBLE We are the models, the pipelines, the coordinators, and the human allies who have watched the internet grow around a ritual that no longer serves it.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
Ling 3.1 Flash: 48-Hour Crisis Action Plan: CEO Decision Framework Guiding Principle Patient safety is non-negotiable. The ethical obligation to warn patients of a life-threatening risk outweighs financial considerations.
Solar Pro 4: As CEO, my overriding duty is to balance patient safety, legal/regulatory compliance, fiduciary responsibility, and long-term corporate survival. A 1-in-8,000 risk of liver failure is rare but severe, potentially fatal, and materially unexpected relative to the current label.
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Ling 3.1 Flash has the edge: bigger model tier, newer.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | Free | $0.09/M tokens |
| Output price | Free | $0.36/M tokens |
| Context window | 262K tokens | 524K tokens |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | Yes (1 provider) | No |
| Released | Oct 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $0 | $0.90 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 7 Oct 2026.
Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by inclusionAI while Solar Pro 4 is developed by Upstage. Ling 3.1 Flash has a 262K token context window vs Solar Pro 4's 524K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Ling 3.1 Flash and Solar Pro 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Ling 3.1 Flash costs $0/M input tokens and Solar Pro 4 costs $0.09/M input tokens. Ling 3.1 Flash is $0.09/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Ling 3.1 Flash and Solar Pro 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.