What is the difference between Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is developed by Meta AI while Qwen3.5 122B A10B is developed by Qwen. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) has a 128K token context window vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 51 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) or Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

It depends on your use case. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Qwen3.5 122B A10B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 51 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) cost compared to Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs $0.59/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs $0.4/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 122B A10B is $0.19/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Qwen3.5 122B A10B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Qwen3.5 122B A10B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Feb 2026

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)vsQwen3.5 122B A10B

Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper than Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) at $0.4/M vs $0.59/M input tokens.

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Qwen3.5 122B A10B compared across 51 shared prompts
Spec	Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)	Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Input price	$0.59/M tokens	$0.4/M tokens
Output price	$0.79/M tokens	$3.2/M tokens
Context window	128K tokens	262K tokens
Parameters	70B	122B (10B active)
Weights	Open	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	No	No
Released	Jul 2024	Feb 2026