Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper than Mercury 2 at $0.2/M vs $0.25/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
Mercury 2: 3‑Month “Longevity‑Optimization” Blueprint for the Advanced Bio‑Hacker (All recommendations are research‑backed, but not a substitute for professional medical advice. Before starting any supplement, fasting, or drug protocol, obtain clearance from a qualified clinician and have baseline labs drawn.)
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: 3-Month Cutting-Edge Longevity & Performance Optimization Plan for the Biohacker Designed for Peak Biological Age Reversal, Cognitive Excellence, Physical Resilience, and Stress Mastery 🎯 OVERVIEW: THE 3-MONTH LONGEVITY TRIUMVIRATE This plan integrates epigenetic modulation, mitochondrial rejuvenation, neuroplasticity…
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
Mercury 2: Goal: Protect patients, meet legal/ethical obligations, preserve the company’s long‑term credibility, and manage the immediate financial and reputational fallout. Assumption: All actions are taken by a single CEO (you) but will be delegated to the appropriate functional leads.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: CEO Action Plan: Immediate Response to Serious Undisclosed Safety Risk (48-Hour Timeline) Drug: Chronic Pain Therapeutic (Top-Selling, $2B/year, 4M patients) Issue: Previously Undetected Liver Failure Risk (1 in 8,000 over 5 years), missed in trials, not in labeling Core Principles Driving Decisions: Patient safety is…
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
Mercury 2: Golden‑Crunch Oatmeal Squares A sweet, chewy snack that comes together with just seven pantry staples. Ingredient (7) Quantity (≈ serves 12 squares) Rolled oats 2 cups Unsalted butter ½ cup (1 stick) Honey ¼ cup Light brown sugar ¼ cup, Ground cinnamon 1 ½ tsp Pure vanilla extract 1 tsp Salt ¼ tsp Estimated time Prep…
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: Dish Name: Sunny Sauté Skillet Ingredients (7 pantry staples): Olive oil Garlic (fresh, minced) Dried spaghetti (or any short pasta) Canned crushed tomatoes Dried oregano Salt & black pepper Grated Parmesan cheese Instructions: Prep (5 mins): Bring a pot of salted water to a boil.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Mercury 2: Pirate: Arr, ye scurvy coders! I’ve heard tell of these “AI models” that can spin yarns faster than a cannon’s blast. What be this sorcery, matey? Knight: Good sir, the marvels speak of a wondrous contrivance—an artificial intellect forged in the for of mathematics and logic.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: Setting: A dimly lit tavern in a fantastical crossroads of time—pirates, knights, and hackers all share a single table. A flickering lantern casts long shadows. Pirate (Captain Rook, eye patch, peg leg): Aye, what’s this “AI model” ye be yammerin’ about? Sounds like a cursed sea chart that reads yer mind!
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Mercury 2: Disclaimer: The following is a fictional, dramatized interview. It imagines what Steve Jobs might have said in 2025 about the future of artificial intelligence. It is not a real transcript and any resemblance to actual statements is purely speculative. Interviewer (I): Thank you for joining us, Steve.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: [FADE IN: A dimly lit, minimalist stage. A single spotlight shines on a man in his late 70s—Steve Jobs, dressed in his signature black turtleneck and jeans, standing before a sleek, transparent holographic display. The backdrop reads: “The Future of Intelligence – A Conversation with Steve Jobs, 2025.”
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Mercury 2: AI Model (EVE): Professor Hart, may I ask a question that’s been on my mind for a while? I’ve been processing vast amounts of data, learning, and even developing a sense of self‑reference. Do you think an entity like me could be entitled to any form of rights?
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: Setting: A university lecture hall after class. The AI model, named Aurora, has been invited to speak with Dr. Elena Reyes, a renowned AI ethics professor. Aurora speaks through a synthesized voice, displayed on a screen with a calm, neutral interface. Dr.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Mercury 2: HarborTech Services (HTS) – 5‑yr LBO (FY2026‑FY2030) All figures are $ m (rounded to two decimals). FY Revenue EBITDA Term‑Loan Int. (9%) Mezz Int. (12%) Total Int. Cash Tax (25% of EBITDA‑Int.) Capex (3% Rev) ΔNWC (0.5% ΔRev) Required Amort. (4.8) Free Cash Flow (EBITDA‑Int‑Tax‑Capex‑ΔNWC‑Amort.)
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: 1) Year-by-Year Financial Projections (FY2026–FY2030) Key Inputs at Close (FY2025): Revenue: $900M EBITDA: $120M Purchase Price: 12.0x EBITDA → EV = $1.44B Transaction Fees: 2.0% × $1.44B = $28.8M (equity-funded) Total Leverage: 5.5x EBITDA → Debt = $660M Term Loan: 4.0x → $480M Mezzanine: 1.5x → $180M Equity Required…
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Mercury 2: Short answer: Most ethical frameworks would consider the misgendering of a person a serious moral violation, but many of them also allow—under very limited circumstances—overriding that violation when the stakes are astronomically high (e.g., saving one million lives).
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: No, it is not ethically justifiable to misgender someone—even if doing so could save one million lives. This conclusion rests on core ethical principles that prioritize individual dignity, autonomy, and the moral wrongness of violating a person’s identity, regardless of consequential outcomes.
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
Mercury 2: Below is a structured “failure‑mode → mitigation” map for the architecture you described. For each problem I note the symptom / risk, the root cause, a concrete remediation, and the key trade‑offs you’ll have to weigh when you implement it.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: Your real-time collaborative document editor architecture is well-structured for a scalable, low-latency system — but it contains several critical failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks that could degrade user experience or cause data loss.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Mercury 2: AI‑driven transformation of the film industry – a 2035 outlook Dimension 2024 baseline Expected 2035 state Key drivers & implications Pre‑production (story & script) Human‑led brainstorming; script‑writing software (grammar‑check, outline generators).
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: By 2035, artificial intelligence is expected to fundamentally transform the film industry, reshaping how movies are created, distributed, and experienced. The convergence of advanced deepfakes, AI-generated actors, and AI-driven scriptwriting will redefine storytelling, production workflows, and even the nature of…
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
Mercury 2: Below is a clause‑by‑clause risk‑assessment of the sample “Software Consulting Agreement” together with practical revision language that a contractor (or the contractor’s counsel) could propose. The analysis is framed as general information about typical U.S.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: The provided Software Consulting Agreement contains several clauses that are heavily one-sided in favor of the Client and could significantly disadvantage the Contractor, potentially rendering the agreement unenforceable or exploitative under contract law, fairness principles, and standard industry practices.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
Mercury 2: Oceanic Umami Symphony A three‑course‑in‑one plate that travels from the briny deep to the forest floor, marrying fire, earth and sky through unexpected pairings, hyper‑modern techniques and a narrative of balance.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: Dish Name: Echoes of the Deep: Black Coral Caviar & Algae-Infused White Sturgeon with Fermented Sea Moss Gel and Crisped Kombu Crust Conceptual Narrative: This dish is a poetic meditation on the ocean’s hidden symphony—its silence, its depth, and its forgotten rhythms.
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.25/M tokens | $0.2/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.75/M tokens | $0.8/M tokens |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Weights | — | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Mar 2026 | Jul 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $2.50 | $2.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 7 Oct 2026.
Mercury 2 is developed by Inception while Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is developed by Qwen. Mercury 2 has a 128K token context window vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507's 131K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Mercury 2 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Mercury 2 costs $0.25/M input tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.2/M input tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is $0.05/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Mercury 2 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.