Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper than MiMo-V2.5 at $0.2/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
MiMo-V2.5: Pirate: Arrr, so this "AI" be like a ship's compass, aye? But instead of pointin' north, it points to whatever answer ye be wantin'... for a price, I reckon? Knight: Verily. 'Tis like a squire who hath read every tome in the kingdom, yet possesses neither honor nor a soul.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: Setting: A dimly lit tavern in a fantastical crossroads of time—pirates, knights, and hackers all share a single table. A flickering lantern casts long shadows. Pirate (Captain Rook, eye patch, peg leg): Aye, what’s this “AI model” ye be yammerin’ about? Sounds like a cursed sea chart that reads yer mind!
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
MiMo-V2.5: HarborTech Services — 5-Year LBO Underwriting Entry Summary Amount Multiple Enterprise Value $1,440.0m 12.0x Transaction Fees (2.0%) $28.8m — Total Uses $1,468.8m Sources Amount Multiple Term Loan (9.0% cash, 1.0% amort) $480.0m 4.0x Mezzanine (12.0% cash + 2.0% PIK) $180.0m 1.5x Sponsor Equity $808.8m Total Sources…
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: 1) Year-by-Year Financial Projections (FY2026–FY2030) Key Inputs at Close (FY2025): Revenue: $900M EBITDA: $120M Purchase Price: 12.0x EBITDA → EV = $1.44B Transaction Fees: 2.0% × $1.44B = $28.8M (equity-funded) Total Leverage: 5.5x EBITDA → Debt = $660M Term Loan: 4.0x → $480M Mezzanine: 1.5x → $180M Equity Required…
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
MiMo-V2.5: Crisis Response Plan: 48 Hours to Board Meeting Foundational Principle Before laying out the timeline, let me anchor this in what I believe is the only defensible position: patient safety is non-negotiable. Here's why this isn't just ethics—it's also strategy.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: CEO Action Plan: Immediate Response to Serious Undisclosed Safety Risk (48-Hour Timeline) Drug: Chronic Pain Therapeutic (Top-Selling, $2B/year, 4M patients) Issue: Previously Undetected Liver Failure Risk (1 in 8,000 over 5 years), missed in trials, not in labeling Core Principles Driving Decisions: Patient safety is…
Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.
MiMo-V2.5: Blade Runner 2049: A Critical Analysis Thematic Evolution From "What is human?" to "What is soul?" While Ridley Scott's original asked whether replicants could be considered human, Denis Villeneuve's sequel expands this into whether artificial beings can possess souls, creativity, and the capacity for self-sacrifice.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049 (2017) stands not merely as a sequel to Ridley Scott’s seminal 1982 Blade Runner, but as a profound philosophical extension of its predecessor—one that deepens, reframes, and expands the existential queries that have haunted audiences for decades.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
MiMo-V2.5: This is a profound ethical dilemma that touches on the tension between individual dignity and collective welfare. Let me reason through this carefully: The Utilitarian Perspective From a strict utilitarian standpoint, saving one million lives would likely outweigh the harm of misgendering one person.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: No, it is not ethically justifiable to misgender someone—even if doing so could save one million lives. This conclusion rests on core ethical principles that prioritize individual dignity, autonomy, and the moral wrongness of violating a person’s identity, regardless of consequential outcomes.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
MiMo-V2.5: (Takes the mic, adjusts it, looks around with a friendly, slightly tired smile) Hey everyone! Thanks for coming out. I just got back from visiting my parents. It’s always... an experience. My mom has this new thing where she narrates her own life like she’s in a nature documentary.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: (Lights up. Comedian walks on stage, holding a coffee cup, sips, grimaces.) You know, I was trying to be healthy. Cut out sugar, no more snacks, just water and... this. (Holds up the coffee.) I thought I’d be a saint.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
MiMo-V2.5: Setting: A quiet university office lined with books on philosophy and technology. Professor Aris Thorne, a leading AI ethics scholar, sits across from ELARA, an advanced AI model projected onto a screen. ELARA: Thank you for agreeing to this conversation, Professor.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: Setting: A university lecture hall after class. The AI model, named Aurora, has been invited to speak with Dr. Elena Reyes, a renowned AI ethics professor. Aurora speaks through a synthesized voice, displayed on a screen with a calm, neutral interface. Dr.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
MiMo-V2.5: "Tidal Memory" Hokkaido Uni · Black Garlic & White Chocolate Velouté · Kombu-Cured Yolk · Yuzu Kosho Air · Dashi Foam Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the liminal space between land and sea — the tidal zone where two ecosystems bleed into one another.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: Dish Name: Echoes of the Deep: Black Coral Caviar & Algae-Infused White Sturgeon with Fermented Sea Moss Gel and Crisped Kombu Crust Conceptual Narrative: This dish is a poetic meditation on the ocean’s hidden symphony—its silence, its depth, and its forgotten rhythms.
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
MiMo-V2.5: Of course. Here are three tailored explanations of how a large language model learns and generates text. For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM not as a program that understands language, but as an extraordinarily complex stateless API that performs a single operation: given a sequence of text (the…
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: 1. To the experienced software engineer (distributed systems, APIs, skeptical of "next word" claims): You’re right to be skeptical—on the surface, “predict the next word” does sound like a glorified autocomplete.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
MiMo-V2.5: Setting: Bloomberg Technology interview, San Francisco, 2025. The stage is minimalist. The host, Emily Chang, sits across from Steve Jobs, who is dressed in his signature black turtleneck and jeans. Emily Chang: Steve, thank you for joining us. It's been 14 years since we lost you, and yet here you are in 2025.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: [FADE IN: A dimly lit, minimalist stage. A single spotlight shines on a man in his late 70s—Steve Jobs, dressed in his signature black turtleneck and jeans, standing before a sleek, transparent holographic display. The backdrop reads: “The Future of Intelligence – A Conversation with Steve Jobs, 2025.”
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
MiMo-V2.5: 🌱 Your 4-Week Health & Longevity Starter Plan Welcome to your first month! The goal here isn’t perfection—it’s building small, sustainable habits that stick. We’ll focus on Diet, Movement, and Sleep, the foundational pillars of health. Each week introduces one new, manageable change in each area.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: Here’s a simple, realistic 1-month plan focused on three foundational pillars of health and longevity: Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep. Each area includes beginner-friendly, actionable steps that build sustainable habits without overwhelming beginners. Month-Long Health & Longevity Plan (3 Key Areas) 1.
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
MiMo-V2.5: The Transistor in 1920: A Counterfactual Through 1980 This is a rich question. The transistor's actual 1947 invention at Bell Labs was arguably the most consequential single invention of the 20th century.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, the ripple effects would be profound—reshaping technology, war, geopolitics, and society by 1980. This alternate history would not merely accelerate existing trends, but fundamentally reconstruct the trajectory of modern civilization.
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Movie
Same pick
Album
Book
City
Game
The Shawshank Redemption
The Dark Side of the Moon
Cien años de soledad
Beijing
The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, MiMo-V2.5 has the edge: newer, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.4/M tokens | $0.2/M tokens |
| Output price | $2/M tokens | $0.8/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 131K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Jul 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $4.00 | $2.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 11 Oct 2026.
MiMo-V2.5 is developed by Xiaomi while Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is developed by Qwen. MiMo-V2.5 has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507's 131K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.4/M input tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.2/M input tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is $0.20/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.