Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Compare Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 by Meta AI against Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 37 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge — newer, major provider backing.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Input
$1.25
Output
$4.25
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Input
$0.40
3.1× cheaper
Output
$4.00
1.1× cheaper
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) is cheaper on both — 3.1× input, 1.1× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
36%
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) uses 34.0x more emoji
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
61%Vocabulary54%
20wSentence Length15w
0.10Hedging0.36
3.7Bold7.0
2.0Lists4.6
0.01Emoji0.34
0.52Headings0.94
0.02Transitions0.09
Based on 29 + 18 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
