Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Compare Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 by Meta AI against Qwen3 Coder Next by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Qwen3 Coder NextRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge — newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Input
$1.25
Output
$4.25
Qwen3 Coder Next
Input
$0.20
6.3× cheaper
Output
$1.50
2.8× cheaper
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper on both — 6.3× input, 2.8× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
44%
Qwen3 Coder Next uses 85.8x more emoji
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Qwen3 Coder Next
61%Vocabulary58%
20wSentence Length19w
0.10Hedging0.29
3.7Bold6.3
2.0Lists4.0
0.01Emoji0.86
0.52Headings0.92
0.02Transitions0.07
Based on 29 + 21 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
