Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B
Compare Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B, both from Qwen, context windows of 131K vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input
$0.20
1.3× cheaper
Output
$0.80
2.5× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B
Input
$0.25
Output
$2.00
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper on both — 1.3× input, 2.5× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
43%
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 uses 103.6x more emoji
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B
55%Vocabulary51%
18wSentence Length15w
0.52Hedging0.39
6.7Bold6.8
4.3Lists4.8
1.04Emoji0.00
0.92Headings0.84
0.11Transitions0.14
Based on 22 + 23 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
