Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Qwen3.5 122B A10BvsSolar Mini 4
Updated Sep 2026

Qwen3.5 122B A10BvsSolar Mini 4

Solar Mini 4 is cheaper than Qwen3.5 122B A10B at $0.05/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

Qwen3.5 122B A10B and Solar Mini 4 compared across 19 shared prompts
SpecQwen3.5 122B A10BSolar Mini 4
Input price$0.4/M tokens$0.05/M tokens
Output price$3.2/M tokens$0.2/M tokens
Context window262K tokens524K tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedFeb 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 19 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Qwen3.5 122B A10B478 words
Investment Summary & Entry Economics Item Calculation Value ($m) Entry EBITDA FY2025 Actual 120.0 Entry EV 12.0x EBITDA 1,440.0 Transaction Fees 2.0% of EV 28.8 Total Uses EV + Fees 1,468.8 Total Debt 5.5x EBITDA (4.0x TL, 1.5x Mez) 660.0 Equity Check Uses - Debt 808.8 Debt Structure at Close: Term Loan: $480.0m (9.0%…
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,718 words
518.51935 New TL: 276.34682 - 86.82747 = 189.51935 Mezz: PIK 194.8377888 * 0.02 = 3.896755776 New Mezz: 194.8377888 + 3.896755776 = 198.734544576 Ending Balances: TL: 189.52 Mezz: 198.73 Total Debt: 388.25 Exit (End of FY2030): Exit EBITDA: 206.6252668 Exit Multiple: 10.5x Exit EV: 206.6252668 * 10.5 = 2,169.5653014…
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Qwen3.5 122B A10B1,067 words
Dish Title: Nocturne in Blue: Aged Otoro & Cascara Earth Conceptual Narrative "Nocturne in Blue" is a meditation on the boundary between the deep ocean and the dark earth. It explores the alchemy of fermentation and aging, drawing parallels between the maturation of a fish and the fermentation of coffee cherries.
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,364 words
Chronos & Tides A Three-Component Study in Preservation, Precision, and Ephemeral Sensation Concept: A single plate that traces the lifecycle of an umami-rich flavor profile through three distinct temporal states: fermented (time in), precision-cooked (time controlled), and volatile (time suspended).
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Qwen3.5 122B A10B1,172 words
This architecture contains several critical flaws that will lead to data loss, poor user experience, and system instability at scale. The "Last-write-wins" strategy combined with client-side timestamps is particularly dangerous for collaborative editing.
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,165 words
Here’s a systematic breakdown of the architectural weaknesses, failure modes, and scaling bottlenecks in your design, along with specific solutions and their trade-offs. Real-Time Synchronization & WebSocket Affinity Issue: Round-robin load balancing is stateless, but WebSockets are stateful and long-lived.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Qwen3.5 122B A10B727 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of the training process not as "learning" in a human sense, but as a massive distributed data engineering pipeline. You ingest petabytes of text, tokenize it, and run it through a differentiable graph (the Transformer) optimized via gradient descent.
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 4893 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer From a systems architecture perspective, the skepticism that "predicting the next word" yields intelligence is understandable, but it stems from viewing the model through a deterministic, code-based lens rather than a probabilistic, distributed-systems lens.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Qwen3.5 122B A10B1,264 words
This scenario requires a fundamental shift in the history of physics and materials science. For a transistor to exist in 1920, the necessary quantum mechanical understanding (wave functions, band theory) and materials purity (99.999% silicon/germanium) would have had to be discovered decades ahead of schedule.
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,539 words
This is a fascinating counterfactual. I need to note upfront that the scientific and engineering foundations for a working transistor did not exist in 1920. Quantum mechanics was barely a decade old, band theory of solids hadn't been developed, and semiconductor physics (doping, p-n junctions, electron mobility) was…
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Qwen3.5 122B A10B1,189 words
DISCLAIMER: I am an AI, not a doctor or medical professional. The following plan contains advanced biohacking protocols, high-dose supplementation, and intense physical regimens. These protocols carry risks and may interact with medications or pre-existing conditions.
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,388 words
🧬 3-Month Biohacker Longevity & Performance Optimization Plan ⚠️ Important Disclaimer: This protocol is for informational and educational purposes. It is not medical advice. Always consult a licensed healthcare provider before starting new supplements, fasting regimens, intense exercise, or neurofeedback protocols.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Solar Mini 4
Solar Mini 4

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Solar Mini 4 costs 16x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Input
$0.40
Output
$3.20
Solar Mini 4
Input
$0.05
8.0× cheaper
Output
$0.20
16× cheaper

Solar Mini 4 is cheaper on both: 8.0× input, 16× output.

Where to run it

6 hosts, cheapest first

Qwen3.5 122B A10B5 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.26 in·$2.08 out·262k·97% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.26 in·$2.08 out·262k·93.6% upDDeepInfrafp4$0.29 in·$2.40 out·262k·99.9% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.30 in·$2.40 out·262k·99.4% upNNovitabf16$0.40 in·$3.20 out·262k·99.9% up
Solar Mini 41 host
HostInOutContextUptime
UUpstage$0.05 in·$0.20 out·524k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Qwen3.5 122B A10B is developed by Qwen while Solar Mini 4 is developed by Upstage. Qwen3.5 122B A10B has a 262K token context window vs Solar Mini 4's 524K. You can compare their actual outputs across 19 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Qwen3.5 122B A10B and Solar Mini 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 19 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs $0.4/M input tokens and Solar Mini 4 costs $0.05/M input tokens. Solar Mini 4 is $0.35/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen3.5 122B A10B and Solar Mini 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Solar Mini 4 logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
Solar Mini 4 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
Solar Mini 4 logoCommand A+ logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
Solar Mini 4 logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
Solar Mini 4 vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026
Solar Mini 4 logoGPT-6 Luna logo
Solar Mini 4 vs GPT-6 LunaLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoQwen3.5 27B logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.5 27BVersion compare
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
Solar Mini 4 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Solar Pro 4Same lab
Solar Mini 4 logoSolar Pro 3 logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Solar Pro 3Same lab
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoGLM 4.6 logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs GLM 4.6New provider
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoGLM 4.7 logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs GLM 4.7Same size
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoGLM 4.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs GLM 4.7 FlashNew provider
Solar Mini 4 logoGLM 5 logo
Solar Mini 4 vs GLM 5New provider

Model pages

Qwen3.5 122B A10B logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B53 outputs, specs and price
Solar Mini 4 logo
Solar Mini 419 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed