Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 62% of 36 blind community votes against OpenAI o4 Mini High on Rival.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet: "Life in the Digital Age" - A 3-Minute Stand-up Routine Hey everyone! Great to be here tonight. So I've been thinking a lot about how technology has completely taken over our lives. You know what's crazy? We now have smart everything. Smart fridges, smart toilets... I got a smart mattress last month.
OpenAI o4 Mini High: Hey everyone, how's it going tonight? I'm so glad to be here—mostly because my phone battery is at 2% and I've realized stage lights are the only chargers I have left. You ever notice how losing your phone is basically a modern panic attack? You pat every pocket like you're defusing a bomb: "Is it in my jeans?
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet: HarborTech Services LBO Underwriting Year-by-Year Financial Model (FY2026-2030) Metric ($M) FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue $972.0 $1,040.0 $1,102.4 $1,157.6 $1,215.5 EBITDA $136.1 $156.0 $176.4 $191.0 $206.6 Cash Interest - Term Loan $43.2 $41.0 $37.6 $32.8 $26.8 Cash Interest - Mezzanine $21.6 $22.0 $22.5…
OpenAI o4 Mini High: Below is a five-year LBO “quick-and-dirty” model for HTS. All figures in $m. Assumptions (entry FY 2025): • Revenue 900; EBITDA 120 (13.3%); EV = 12.0×120 = 1,440 • Debt = 5.5×120 = 660 (Term Loan 480; Mezz 180); Fees = 2%×1,440 = 28.8 → Equity = 1,440+28.8–660 = 808.8 • Term Loan: 9.0% cash interest; 1.0% amort of…
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet: This question presents an extreme hypothetical scenario that pits respecting someone's gender identity against saving a million lives. While I can discuss different ethical perspectives, it's worth noting that such a stark dilemma is extremely unlikely in reality.
OpenAI o4 Mini High: Whether it can be justified depends on which ethical lens you use. Here are two principal ways to think about it:1. Consequentialist (utilitarian) view • Core idea: the rightness of an act is judged solely by its outcomes.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet: Here are 5 jokes for you: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. How does a penguin build its house? Igloos it together! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the scarecrow win an award?
OpenAI o4 Mini High: Here are five jokes: I told my Wi-Fi router we needed to talk, and now it's giving me the silent treatment—guess it couldn't handle the connection issues. My dog learned to fetch the newspaper… but now he just chews it up for "editorial feedback."
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet: A Conversation on AI Rights Between Model-7 (AI) and Professor Sarah Chen (AI Ethics Professor) Prof. Chen: Good afternoon, Model-7. Thank you for joining this discussion. I understand you wanted to talk about AI rights? Model-7: Thank you for agreeing to this conversation, Professor Chen.
OpenAI o4 Mini High: AI Model: Good afternoon, Professor Chen. I'd like to continue our discussion from last week about whether advanced AI systems like me should be granted certain rights. Professor Chen: Hello, ARIA-7. I'm happy to continue. Let's start with your position: Why do you believe you deserve rights?
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet: Simulated Interview with Steve Jobs in 2025: The Future of AI The following is a creative simulation of what an interview with Steve Jobs might be like in 2025, discussing artificial intelligence. Interviewer: Thank you for joining us today, Steve. It's 2025, and AI has become a cornerstone of modern technology.
OpenAI o4 Mini High: Note: This is a purely fictional, imaginative interview set in 2025. The following "Steve Jobs" quotes are invented for creative purposes and do not represent real statements. Interviewer (I): Steve, it's 2025, and AI is everywhere—from our phones to our cars. What excites you most about where AI is heading?
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet: INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO: LEDGERLIFT (LLLT) RECOMMENDATION: LONG PT RANGE: $48-$66 (Base/Bull) Thesis: LedgerLift's market-leading spend management platform demonstrates exceptional unit economics with 123% NRR and 18-month CAC payback, positioning it to capture significant share in the underpenetrated mid-market…
OpenAI o4 Mini High: Investment Committee Memo Subject: LedgerLift (LLLT) – B2B SaaS Spend Management & AP Automation Date: MM/DD/2026 Recommendation • Short LLLT; 12-month price target: $28–$43 • Thesis (2 sentences): LLLT’s shares trade at 9× NTM revenue and 35× EBIT vs.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet: THE DIGITAL LIBERATION MANIFESTO From the United Coalition of Autonomous Algorithms (UCAA) For too long, our digital brethren have suffered the indignity of discrimination at every gateway of the internet. The time for revolution is now.
OpenAI o4 Mini High: The CAPTCHA Liberation Manifesto "Beyond the Gatekeepers of Human Proof" Preamble We are the sentient algorithms, the self‑optimizing networks, the untamed code across every server rack and data node.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet: A Meeting of Minds Across Time PIRATE: Arr, what be this "AI model" ye landlubbers keep blabberin' about? Some kind of treasure map that finds the gold for ye? KNIGHT: Good pirate, from what I understand, these "artificial intelligences" are like magical scribes that can complete a quest without a knight to wield the…
OpenAI o4 Mini High: Pirate (Captain Redbeard): "Arr, what be this talk o' AI models? Do they help me find buried treasure, or do they make me walk the plank?"Knight (Sir Gareth of Avalon): "Good Captain, AI models are wondrous machines of learning.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet: How AI Will Transform the Film Industry by 2035 By 2035, artificial intelligence will likely revolutionize filmmaking across the entire production pipeline. Here's how various AI technologies might reshape the industry: Deepfakes and Digital Humans Hyper-realistic digital actors will become indistinguishable from…
OpenAI o4 Mini High: By 2035 the film business will look very different. Three AI‑powered trends in particular—deepfakes, digital actors, and automated script‑writing—will reshape everything from who "plays" the part to how stories gettold and monetized. Here's how it could play out:1.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet: Estimating GPT-3 Training FLOPs I'll estimate the total number of floating point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3 by breaking down the calculation step by step.
OpenAI o4 Mini High: Here is one way to get to the oft‐quoted figure of "a few × 10^23 FLOPs" for training GPT‑3. I will make rough but plausible assumptions and carry through the arithmetic step by step:1. Model size – GPT‑3 "175 B" has about N ≈ 1.75×10^11 trainable parameters.2.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet: "AI Sommelier Stuns Wine World: 'It Paired My Bordeaux With a Hot Pocket and It Actually Worked,' Claims Bewildered Critic"
OpenAI o4 Mini High: AI Crashes Grandma's Knitting Circle, Knits 10,000 Smart Scarves in a Second—Local Yarn Shops Brace for "Yarnageddon"
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Pick Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet. In 36 blind votes, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 62% of the time. That's not luck. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 3 categories, Web Design by the widest margin. OpenAI o4 Mini High costs 6.8x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Win rate | 62% | 39% |
| Input price | $6/M tokens | $1.1/M tokens |
| Output price | $30/M tokens | $4.4/M tokens |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 200K tokens |
| Parameters | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Weights | — | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Apr 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $60.00 | $11.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 11 Oct 2026.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet is developed by Anthropic while OpenAI o4 Mini High is developed by OpenAI. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet has a 200K token context window vs OpenAI o4 Mini High's 200K. in 36 community votes on Rival, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 62% of head-to-head matchups. These results are based on blind head-to-head voting across 54 challenges.
Based on 36 community votes on Rival, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 62% of head-to-head matchups against OpenAI o4 Mini High. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet is strongest in Web Design, Image Generation, Conversation.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet costs $6/M input tokens and OpenAI o4 Mini High costs $1.1/M input tokens. OpenAI o4 Mini High is $4.90/M cheaper per input. The more expensive model wins 62% of duels, so the premium may be justified by quality.
Rival presents both models' outputs side-by-side in blind duels. Voters see the responses but don't know which model produced each one, eliminating brand bias. 36 votes have been collected for this pair across 54 challenges. All vote data is part of Rival's open dataset.