Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs OpenAI o4 Mini High

Compare Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet by Anthropic against OpenAI o4 Mini High by OpenAI, in 36 community votes, claude 3.7 thinking sonnet wins 62% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 200K, tested across 38 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet or OpenAI o4 Mini High?

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet is the better choice overall, winning 62% of 36 blind community votes on Rival. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet costs $6/M input tokens vs $1.1/M for OpenAI o4 Mini High. Context windows: 200K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and OpenAI o4 Mini High

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet is made by anthropic while OpenAI o4 Mini High is from openai. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to OpenAI o4 Mini High's 200K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet costs $6/M input tokens vs $1.1/M for OpenAI o4 Mini High. In community voting, In 36 community votes, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 62% of head-to-head duels.

In 36 community votes, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 62% of head-to-head duels. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet leads in Web Design, Image Generation, Conversation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 36+ human preference judgments for this pair.

Web Design: Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 67% of votes
Image Generation: Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 60% of votes
Conversation: Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 67% of votes
Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetWinner
OpenAI o4 Mini High
OpenAI o4 Mini HighRunner-up

Pick Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet. In 36 blind votes, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 62% of the time. That's not luck.

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet particularly excels in Web Design, Conversation, Image Generation. OpenAI o4 Mini High is 6.8x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Clear winner
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
49%

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet uses 223.5x more bold

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
OpenAI o4 Mini High
61%Vocabulary70%
49wSentence Length18w
0.64Hedging0.33
2.2Bold0.0
4.5Lists1.3
0.00Emoji0.02
1.81Headings0.00
0.21Transitions0.04
Based on 21 + 14 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetOpenAI o4 Mini High

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions