Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Z.ai: GLM 5

Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against Z.ai: GLM 5 by Zhipu AI, context windows of 200K vs 203K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Z.ai: GLM 5?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Z.ai: GLM 5 are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.8/M for Z.ai: GLM 5. Context windows: 200K vs 203K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Z.ai: GLM 5

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while Z.ai: GLM 5 is from zhipu. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to Z.ai: GLM 5's 203K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.8/M for Z.ai: GLM 5.

Our Verdict
Z.ai: GLM 5
Z.ai: GLM 5
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Claude 3.7 SonnetRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Z.ai: GLM 5 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.

Z.ai: GLM 5 is 5.9x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
98%

Z.ai: GLM 5 uses 5.2x more bold

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Z.ai: GLM 5
62%Vocabulary54%
35wSentence Length17w
0.99Hedging0.37
1.2Bold6.3
4.3Lists4.7
0.00Emoji0.00
1.78Headings0.60
0.23Transitions0.18
Based on 13 + 22 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude 3.7 SonnetZ.ai: GLM 5

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions