Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs o1
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against o1 by OpenAI, in 7 community votes, claude 3.7 sonnet wins 83% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or o1?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the better choice overall, winning 83% of 7 blind community votes on Rival. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $15/M for o1. Context windows: 200K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and o1
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while o1 is from openai. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to o1's 128K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $15/M for o1. In community voting, In 7 community votes, Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 83% of head-to-head duels.
In 7 community votes, Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 83% of head-to-head duels. Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads in Web Design, Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 7+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Per 1M tokens
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is cheaper on both — 5.0× input, 4.0× output
Pick Claude 3.7 Sonnet. In 7 blind votes, Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 83% of the time. That's not luck.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet particularly excels in Web Design, Image Generation. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is 4.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
o1 uses 4.2x more bold
