Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs OpenAI o4 Mini High
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against OpenAI o4 Mini High by OpenAI, in 9 community votes, openai o4 mini high wins 56% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 200K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or OpenAI o4 Mini High?
OpenAI o4 Mini High is the better choice overall, winning 56% of 9 blind community votes on Rival. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $1.1/M for OpenAI o4 Mini High. Context windows: 200K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and OpenAI o4 Mini High
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while OpenAI o4 Mini High is from openai. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to OpenAI o4 Mini High's 200K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $1.1/M for OpenAI o4 Mini High. In community voting, In 9 community votes, OpenAI o4 Mini High wins 56% of head-to-head duels.
In 9 community votes, OpenAI o4 Mini High wins 56% of head-to-head duels. Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads in Web Design, while OpenAI o4 Mini High leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 9+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Per 1M tokens
OpenAI o4 Mini High is cheaper on both — 2.7× input, 3.4× output
OpenAI o4 Mini High has the edge overall. In 9 blind votes, OpenAI o4 Mini High wins 56% of the time.
Pick Claude 3.7 Sonnet for Web Design. Pick OpenAI o4 Mini High for Image Generation. OpenAI o4 Mini High is 3.4x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 121.0x more bold
