Claude Fable 5vsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper than Claude Fable 5 at $0.15/M vs $10/M input tokens.
| Spec | Claude Fable 5 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $10/M tokens | $0.15/M tokens |
| Output price | $50/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 66K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jun 2026 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
Claude Fable 5
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Fable 5 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs 33x less per token.
Slight edge
Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Fable 5
Input
$10.00
Output
$50.00
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input
$0.15
67× cheaper
Output
$1.50
33× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper on both: 67× input, 33× output.
Where to run it
6 hosts
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking2 hosts
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
55%
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 1.7x more transitions
Claude Fable 5
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
60%Vocabulary56%
22wSentence Length16w
0.49Hedging0.32
4.0Bold5.1
3.5Lists3.9
0.58Emoji0.92
1.09Headings0.75
0.05Transitions0.08
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT-5New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Claude Opus 4.1Cross-provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT-5.2New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT-5.2 ChatNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT-5.2 ProNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT-5.3 ChatNew provider