Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Compare Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic against Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B by Qwen, context windows of 200K vs 262K, tested across 35 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Claude Opus 4 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.6/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Context windows: 200K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Claude Opus 4 is made by anthropic while Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is from qwen. Claude Opus 4 has a 200K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.6/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B.

Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is 21x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
97%

Claude Opus 4 uses 4.3x more sentence length

Claude Opus 4
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
64%Vocabulary54%
62wSentence Length14w
0.52Hedging0.39
4.4Bold6.9
9.1Lists4.2
0.11Emoji0.23
1.87Headings0.93
0.27Transitions0.17
Based on 16 + 23 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Opus 4Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions