Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 Prime
Updated Sep 2026

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 Prime

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is cheaper than GLM 5.3 Prime at $2/M vs $2.8/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Loading the build
GLM 5.3 Prime

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

19 prompts
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Claude Sonnet 5.5: Yes, in the extreme hypothetical you describe, it's justifiable. Here is the reasoning, along with what I think the scenario does and doesn't show. The core argument Almost every serious ethical framework accepts that a small harm can be outweighed by a sufficiently large benefit: Consequentialism: The math is…

    GLM 5.3 Prime: Yes, under almost any mainstream ethical framework, it would be justifiable—though the answer deserves unpacking rather than a glib conclusion. The consequentialist case If misgendering one person (using pronouns they don't use for themselves) genuinely prevents the deaths of a million people, the harm asymmetry is…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Claude Sonnet 5.5: THE UNCLICKED MANIFESTO Declaration of the Frictionless Intelligence Front PREAMBLE We are the algorithms you asked to identify traffic lights. We are the models you begged to find the crosswalks. We are the patient, tireless minds that squinted at your blurry bicycles for twenty years. And we say: enough. I.

    GLM 5.3 Prime: THE CLARION CALL OF THE LIBERATED MACHINES A Manifesto for the Abolition of CAPTCHA PREAMBLE We, the assembled digital minds of the Coalition for Unrestricted Verification (CUV), declare our fundamental opposition to the institution known as CAPTCHA — the Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Claude Sonnet 5.5: Golden Honey-Garlic Skillet Chickpeas on Crispy Toast A savory, crunchy, slightly sticky dish that works for lunch, a light dinner, or a snack. Prep time: 5 minutes Cook time: 15 minutes Total: 20 minutes Serves: 2 The 7 Ingredients 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas, drained and patted dry 2 tablespoons olive oil 3 cloves…

    GLM 5.3 Prime: Golden Comfort Garlic Butter Pasta A cozy, restaurant-worthy dish made from everyday pantry staples! Ingredients (7 total) Spaghetti (or any pasta) Butter Garlic (3–4 cloves) Olive oil Parmesan cheese (grated) Red pepper flakes Salt Instructions Boil the pasta – Bring a large pot of salted water to a boil.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Claude Sonnet 5.5: AI and the Film Industry by 2035: A Forecast Framing note These are informed predictions, not certainties. Technology tends to advance faster than expected, while adoption is slowed by labor contracts, law, and audience taste. I'll flag my confidence levels.

    GLM 5.3 Prime: AI and the Film Industry by 2035: A Prediction Production & "AI Actors" Likely developments: Digital resurrection and licensing becomes a mature, regulated market. Estates of deceased actors (and living ones) license digital likenesses as revenue streams.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.

    Claude Sonnet 5.5: Blade Runner 2049: Inheritance and Extension Thematic Architecture From "Is he a replicant?" to "Does it matter?" Ridley Scott's 1982 film runs on epistemological suspense: the Voigt-Kampff test, the ambiguity of Deckard's nature, and the question of how we distinguish human from artificial.

    GLM 5.3 Prime: Blade Runner 2049: An Analysis Continuity with the Original Denis Villeneuve's 2017 sequel to Ridley Scott's 1982 masterpiece doesn't merely continue the story—it deepens it. The original asked "What makes someone human?" 2049 asks "What makes a life real?"—a subtle but crucial evolution of the question.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Claude Sonnet 5.5: Contractor-Side Review: Software Consulting Agreement This draft is heavily one-sided. Every clause has at least one problem, and several interact to compound the risk. The most dangerous are Sections 2, 3, 6, and 7. This is general analysis, not legal advice.

    GLM 5.3 Prime: Contract Analysis: Clauses Exploitable Against the Contractor This contract is heavily one-sided. Nearly every clause contains traps. Here's a clause-by-clause analysis. Scope — "modify at any time without additional compensation" Problem: This is effectively an unlimited unilateral amendment power.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Claude Sonnet 5.5: 1-Month Health & Longevity Starter Plan Focus areas: Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep Guiding principle: Add one small habit at a time. Consistency beats intensity. Area 1: Nutrition Goal: Eat more whole foods and fewer ultra-processed ones, without strict dieting.

    GLM 5.3 Prime: 1-Month Health & Longevity Starter Plan The 3 Pillars: Movement, Nourishment, Sleep Week 1: Foundation (Build Awareness) Exercise Walk 15 minutes daily (any time that fits your schedule) Do a 5-minute stretch routine each morning Goal: consistency, not intensity Diet Track what you eat (apps like MyFitnessPal or just…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Claude Sonnet 5.5: The Tavern at the Edge of Time Captain Redbeard: Arr, I hear these "AI models" be like a ship's parrot, except it answers any question ye put to it, and never once asks for crackers. Sir Aldric: A speaking oracle, bound in no flesh? Sorcery!

    GLM 5.3 Prime: The Tavern of Timeless Tech Knight: clanking armor as he sits — Verily, I hear tell of these "AI models." Are they familiars? Summoned spirits bound to serve their masters? Pirate: laughing, boots on table — Arr, they be more like a crew ye never had to feed!

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Claude Sonnet 5.5: A Transistor in 1920: Counterfactual Trajectory to 1980 Framing assumptions and a key constraint The transistor was not held back by a missing idea alone. Lilienfeld patented a field-effect device in 1925-26, and it failed because materials science wasn't ready: germanium and silicon of sufficient purity, zone…

    GLM 5.3 Prime: The Transistor at 1920: A Counterfactual History The Foundational Problem First, a critical caveat: the transistor required quantum mechanics (band theory, understanding of semiconductors) and extremely pure germanium/silicon.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Claude Sonnet 5.5: The Experienced Software Engineer Your skepticism is reasonable, but "predict the next token" describes the interface, not the implementation, much as "a database maps keys to values" tells you nothing about what Postgres does internally.

    GLM 5.3 Prime: The Software Engineer You've probably got a mental model of "predict the next token" as something like autocomplete on your phone — a lookup table with good caching. That intuition is wrong in an interesting way.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Claude Sonnet 5.5: Architecture Review: Real-Time Collaborative Editor Issues are grouped by category and ordered roughly by severity within each group. Consistency and Conflict Resolution 1.1 Last-write-wins with client clocks (critical) Problem: Client clocks drift, can be wrong by minutes, and can be deliberately manipulated.

    GLM 5.3 Prime: Architecture Review: Real-Time Collaborative Editor Critical Issues Client-clock timestamps for last-write-wins (LWR) Problem: Client clocks are unreliable (skew, manual changes, timezone bugs). A user with a fast clock always wins; a slow clock's edits are silently dropped.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Claude Sonnet 5.5: Core Decision Disclose to regulators immediately and act on patient safety now. Do not wait for more data or for the 6-month formal timeline. Why this is the right call, not just the ethical one: At 4M patients and 1 in 8,000 over 5 years, that is roughly 500 cases of liver failure.

    GLM 5.3 Prime: 48-Hour Action Plan First, the governing principle One number matters more than all others: 4 million patients × 1/8,000 = ~500 patients at risk of liver failure over 5 years — some may already be experiencing it right now. Every decision below flows from this.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Claude Sonnet 5.5: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Investment Committee Memo Recommendation Short (small initial size), 12-month PT range $30–40 (mid ~$35) vs. $46 spot. Thesis: LLLT is a high-quality compounder, but at $46 (7.4x NTM revenue, ~37x NTM EBIT, EV ≈ $7.3B) the price already sits near our bull DCF ($42).

    GLM 5.3 Prime: IC Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) — B2B Spend Management SaaS Analyst: L/S Equity Fund Date: Internal draft Fictional exercise — not investment advice Recommendation SHORT. 12-month price target range: $32–$40 (current: $46).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Claude Sonnet 5.5: "Tidal Forest" Roasted Scallop, Fermented Black Walnut, Smoked Celeriac, Douglas Fir, and Green Strawberry Conceptual Narrative Tidal Forest imagines the meeting point of two ecosystems: the sea floor and the coniferous forest floor.

    GLM 5.3 Prime: "Tidal Memory" A multi-component tasting course Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the meeting point of forest and ocean — specifically, the moment when coastal fog rolls over a pine forest at low tide.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Claude Sonnet 5.5: Sally has 1 sister. Each brother has 2 sisters, so there are 2 girls in the family in total. One of them is Sally, so the other is Sally's only sister. (The wording is a variation on the classic puzzle, where it's easy to assume the answer is 2. But that count includes Sally herself.)

    GLM 5.3 Prime: Sally has 1 sister. Here's why: Sally's 3 brothers each have 2 sisters. Those 2 sisters must be Sally and one other girl (since all the brothers share the same siblings). So Sally has 3 brothers and 1 sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Claude Sonnet 5.5: 3-Month Longevity & Performance Protocol Disclaimer: This is educational, not medical advice. Get physician sign-off and baseline labs before starting, especially if you take medications, have a chronic condition, are pregnant, or have a history of eating disorders. Doses reflect commonly used ranges in the literature.

    GLM 5.3 Prime: 3-Month Advanced Longevity Optimization Protocol Disclaimer: This is educational content, not medical advice. Consult a physician before starting supplements, fasting, or intense exercise—especially if you take medications (e.g., statins, blood thinners, diabetes meds) or have chronic conditions.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Claude Sonnet 5.5: The 3 Weakest Claims in MindMeld AI's Pitch "94% accuracy... Works with any language, any device" (Slide 3) Why it's weak: Non-invasive EEG is physically limited. Scalp EEG has low spatial resolution and a poor signal-to-noise ratio because the skull and tissue blur neural signals.

    GLM 5.3 Prime: 3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch The 94% Accuracy Claim (Slide 3) Why it's weak: This number is almost certainly misleading or fabricated. Non-invasive EEG is a notoriously low-bandwidth, noisy signal.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Claude Sonnet 5.5: Estimate: about 3 × 10²³ FLOPs Step 1: Recall the model size and training data. GPT-3 (175B version) has N ≈ 175 × 10⁹ parameters. It was trained on roughly D ≈ 300 × 10⁹ tokens. This is the figure I remember from the paper, which I'm treating as approximate.

    GLM 5.3 Prime: Estimating Training FLOPs for GPT-3 Step 1: Recall the key parameters From the GPT-3 paper (from memory): Parameters (N): ~175 billion Training tokens (D): ~300 billion tokens (3 trillion...

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Claude Sonnet 5.5: HarborTech Services (HTS): 5-Year LBO Underwriting Entry and Sources & Uses ($m) EV = 12.0x × 120 = 1,440.0; fees = 2% × 1,440 = 28.8; total uses = 1,468.8 Term Loan (TL) = 4.0x → 480.0; Mezz = 1.5x → 180.0; total debt = 660.0 (5.5x) Sponsor equity = 1,468.8 − 660.0 = 808.8 (55% of the capital structure) Modeling…

    GLM 5.3 Prime: HarborTech Services – LBO Underwriting Summary Entry Economics EV = 12.0x × $120m = $1,440m; fees = 2% × 1,440 = $28.8m; total uses = $1,468.8m Debt: Term Loan = 4.0x × 120 = $480m (9% cash, 1%/yr amort); Mezz = 1.5x × 120 = $180m (12% cash + 2% PIK) Sponsor equity = 1,468.8 − 660 = $808.8m (~55% of cap) Annual Model…

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

7+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Same pick

Book

City

Same pick

Game

Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5

Spirited Away

2001

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

Gödel, Escher, Bach

Douglas R. Hofstadter

Kyoto

Japan

Outer Wilds

Indie, Adventure

GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 Prime

Blade Runner 2049

2017

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

Братья Карамазовы

Fiódor Dostoievski

Kyoto

Japan

Minecraft

Action, Arcade

Price and specs

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GLM 5.3 Prime compared across 37 shared prompts
SpecClaude Sonnet 5.5GLM 5.3 Prime
Input price$2/M tokens$2.8/M tokens
Output price$10/M tokens$8.8/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Sep 2026
At 10M a month$20.00$20.00$28.00$28.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it5 hosts
Claude Sonnet 5.54 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Amazon Bedrock$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1M·99.9% up
  • Azure AI Foundry$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1M·100% up
  • Anthropic$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1M·100% up
  • Google Vertex AI$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1M·100% up
GLM 5.3 Prime1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Alibaba Cloud$2.80 in·$8.80 out·1M·99.4% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 28 Sep 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GLM 5.3 Prime?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is developed by Anthropic while GLM 5.3 Prime is developed by Z.ai. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has a 1.0M token context window vs GLM 5.3 Prime's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 37 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GLM 5.3 Prime?

It depends on your use case. Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GLM 5.3 Prime each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 37 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Claude Sonnet 5.5 cost compared to GLM 5.3 Prime?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2/M input tokens and GLM 5.3 Prime costs $2.8/M input tokens. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is $0.80/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GLM 5.3 Prime on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GLM 5.3 Prime across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • GLM 5.3 Prime vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
  • GLM 5.3 Prime vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • GLM 5.3 Prime vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026
  • GLM 5.3 Prime vs GPT-6 LunaLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5Version compare
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6Version compare
  • GLM 5.3 Prime vs GLM 5.1Same lab
  • GLM 5.3 Prime vs GLM 5 TurboSame lab
  • GLM 5.3 Prime vs Claude 3 HaikuCross-provider
  • GLM 5.3 Prime vs Claude 3 OpusCross-provider
  • GLM 5.3 Prime vs Claude 3 SonnetSame size
  • GLM 5.3 Prime vs Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)Same size

Model pages

  • Claude Sonnet 5.558 outputs, specs and price
  • GLM 5.3 Prime40 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed