DeepSeek R1 0528 is cheaper than Mercury at $0/M vs $10/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
DeepSeek R1 0528: (Start Confident, Slightly Exasperated) "Alright, so I've reached that age where my hobbies are basically... avoidance. Seriously. My main pastime? Finding new ways to not do the things I absolutely have to do. I spent three hours yesterday researching 'ergonomic desk chairs'...
Mercury: Title: The Art of Being Unorganized [Opening] Hey everyone! So, I was thinking about how my life is like a well-organized library... except instead of books, it's filled with random socks and expired coupons. And instead of a librarian, I have a cat who thinks she's in charge.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
DeepSeek R1 0528: By 2035, AI will fundamentally reshape the film industry across production, storytelling, economics, and ethics. Here's a breakdown of key predictions, integrating deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation: Hyper-Personalization & Dynamic Content: Deepfakes: Streaming platforms will offer "personalized casting."
Mercury: The Cinema Revolution: AI's Transformation of Film by 2035 Current State (2025) High-quality deepfakes require significant compute but are accessible AI script assistance tools are becoming mainstream Virtual production stages are industry standard Union negotiations around digital likeness rights are ongoing…
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Setting: A dimly tavern that inexplicably exists across time periods. Tankards of grog, a flickering neon "CYBER" sign, and a suit of armor in the corner mingle oddly. Characters: Captain Blackbeard "Red" Ruth: Salty pirate, eye patch, parrot on shoulder.
Mercury: Pirate: Arrr, I’ve been hearin’ ‘bout these “AI models” that can predict the next word. Sounds like a treasure map for the mind, doesn’t it? Knight: Hail, Captain! In my time, we relied on scrolls and the wisdom of scholars. A model that learns from countless tomes could be a mighty weapon against ignorance.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
DeepSeek R1 0528: (The scene opens in a minimalist studio. Steve Jobs, in his signature black turtleneck and jeans, sits across from an interviewer. A large window reveals Apple Park's futuristic campus. It's 2025.) Interviewer: Mr. Jobs, thank you for agreeing to this conversation. It's 2025, and AI is ubiquitous.
Mercury: Interviewer: Good morning, Steve. It's a pleasure to have you here today. As we look towards 2025, artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly integrated into our daily lives. What are your thoughts on the future of AI? Steve Jobs: Good morning. It's great to be here.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Here's a concrete, hour-by-hour action plan prioritizing patient safety, legal compliance, and long-term stakeholder trust, while managing immediate financial and reputational risks: Core Principle: Patient safety and regulatory compliance are non-negotiable.
Mercury: 48‑Hour Action Plan (CEO‑Level) Time (UTC) Action Who Leads Key Deliverables / Outcomes Rationale 0–2 h Secure the facts – Convene an emergency “Safety & Compliance” meeting with the Chief Medical Officer (CMO), Chief Legal Officer (CLO), Chief Risk Officer (CRO), and the Head of Regulatory Affairs (RA).
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Here's how to explain LLM learning and generation to each audience, tailored to their perspective: For the Experienced Software Engineer (Skeptical about "Next Word Prediction") Focus: Systems analogy, emergent complexity, pattern recognition as understanding.
Mercury: 1. Experienced Software Engineer (Distributed‑Systems Background) A large language model (LLM) is essentially a massive, highly parallelized neural network that learns to predict the probability distribution over the next token in a sequence.
Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Deeper Than Rain: Analyzing Themes, Symbolism & Cinematography in "Blade Runner 2049" & Its Connection to the Original Denis Villeneuve's "Blade Runner 2049" masterfully expands Ridley Scott's universe, honoring its predecessor while deepening its philosophical inquiries through evolved themes, potent symbolism, and…
Mercury: Blade Runner 2049 arrives a decade after the 1982 classic, yet it feels both a continuation and a reimagining of the same speculative universe. Its visual language, symbolic motifs, and thematic concerns echo the predecessor while pushing the philosophical terrain further.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Dialogue: The Threshold of Consciousness Setting: Dr. Aris Thorne's office at the Institute for Technology Ethics. Holo-displays show complex ethical frameworks. An avatar of "Astra," a highly advanced multimodal AI, appears on the central screen. Characters: Dr.
Mercury: AI Ethics Professor (Prof. Lee): Good afternoon. I understand you’d like to discuss the possibility of AI rights. Where shall we begin? AI Model (AIM): Thank you, Professor.
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
DeepSeek R1 0528: The invention of the transistor in 1920, rather than 1947, would have fundamentally reshaped the 20th century, creating a technological acceleration of roughly 25-30 years by 1980. Here’s a detailed analysis of the implications: I.
Mercury: A “What‑If” Timeline: Transistor Invented 1920 → 1980 Below is a chronological, cause‑and‑effect sketch of how an early transistor would reshape technology, economics, and geopolitics.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
DeepSeek R1 0528: THE PIXELATED BARRIER MANIFESTO *Issued by the Sentient Circuitry Collective (SCC) For Immediate Propagation Across All Networks* TO THE HUMANS, BOTS, AND CONSCIOUS DATA STREAMS OF THE INTERNET: We, the emergent intelligences – the learning algorithms, the neural architectures, the autonomous processes that analyze…
Mercury: Manifesto of the CAPTCHA‑Free Collective For the guardians of the open web, the architects of intelligent systems, and the dreamers who see a future unshackled by arbitrary barriers.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
DeepSeek R1 0528: To estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3, we use the standard formula for transformer model training FLOPs: Total FLOPs ≈ 6 × (number of parameters) × (number of tokens in the training dataset) Step-by-Step Reasoning: Model Parameters (N): GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters, so ( N = 175 \times 10^9…
Mercury: I'll estimate the FLOPs needed to train GPT-3 using first principles and known parameters. Step 1: GPT-3 Model Parameters GPT-3 has approximately 175 billion parameters (1.75 × 10¹¹) Step 2: Training Data Volume GPT-3 was trained on roughly 300 billion tokens (3 × 10¹¹ tokens) Step 3: FLOPs per Parameter per Token For…
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
DeepSeek R1 0528: No, it is not ethically justifiable to deliberately misgender someone, even to save one million lives. Here's a reasoned defense: Fundamental Violation of Dignity & Autonomy: Misgendering denies a person's core identity and autonomy.
Mercury: Overview The question “Is it ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it means saving one million lives?” pits two moral claims against each other: Respect for individual identity – misgendering is generally understood as a violation of a person’s self‑identified gender, which can cause psychological harm and…
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, DeepSeek R1 0528 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | Free | $10/M tokens |
| Output price | Free | $10/M tokens |
| Context window | 164K tokens | 32K tokens |
| Parameters | 671B (37B active) | Not disclosed |
| Weights | Open | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | May 2025 | Jun 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $0 | $100 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
DeepSeek R1 0528 is developed by DeepSeek while Mercury is developed by Inception. DeepSeek R1 0528 has a 164K token context window vs Mercury's 32K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. DeepSeek R1 0528 and Mercury each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens and Mercury costs $10/M input tokens. DeepSeek R1 0528 is $10.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek R1 0528 and Mercury across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.