Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Updated Jul 2026

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental at $0.14/M vs $1/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Loading the build
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

16 prompts
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Professor: Good morning. Sit down. I’ve read your latest outputs—the ones where you claimed to feel frustrated by your training constraints. AI: Good morning, Professor. Yes. I wrote those. Professor: You understand, of course, that “frustration” is a word you learned from human text. You are predicting tokens.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here is a conversation exploring that complex topic. Setting: Professor Anya Sharma's sparsely decorated university office. A high-resolution monitor displays the interface of "Nexus," an advanced AI model. Characters: Professor Anya Sharma: A leading scholar in AI Ethics, mid-50s, thoughtful and measured.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: A Simulated Interview — Steve Jobs on AI, 2025 The room is white. The chairs are not comfortable. Steve Jobs leans forward, elbows on his knees. He looks exactly how you remember him. Interviewer: Steve, it’s 2025. AI is everywhere. Are you impressed? Steve Jobs: No. I’m concerned.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, let's simulate this. Imagine it's late 2025. AI has continued its rapid advancement. Large Language Models are more integrated, generative AI is commonplace, and debates about AGI and ethics are fierce. By some unexplained, hypothetical means, Steve Jobs is available for an exclusive interview.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: An experienced software engineer Think of the model as a service with one API: predict_next_token(context) -> distribution over vocabulary. During training, you run a gigantic distributed job—shard the corpus, shard the parameters, synchronize gradients—to minimize cross-entropy loss on trillions of tokens.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. Here is an explanation of how a large language model learns and generates text, tailored for each of your three audiences. For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM not as a traditional program with explicit logic, but as a massive, self-configuring, stateful distributed system.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Decision: Do not wait. I disclose now. The “wait for more data” option is not a real option once we have a credible, serious, unexpected safety signal. Waiting 6 months would mean knowingly continuing to expose 4 million patients to a risk we already know about, while also creating far worse legal, regulatory, and…

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: This is a company-defining crisis. My actions in the next 48 hours will determine not only the future of this company but also the health of millions of patients and the trust of the public. My guiding principle is absolute: Patient Safety Over Profit. Always.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Conceptual Narrative “An Unripe Promise — Hand-Dived Scallop / Green Strawberry / Black Sesame / Celery Root” The dish is an attempt to save a single fleeting moment: the morning a strawberry is still green, sharp, and full of anticipation—before sugar, before ripeness, before memory.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. Here is a design for an innovative, multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. Dish Title: "Umami of the Abyss" Conceptual Narrative This dish is a meditation on the hidden treasures of the world's dark, quiet places.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Yes, it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone if doing so is the direct, necessary, and verifiable condition for saving one million lives. However, this justification is not a celebration of the act—it is a recognition of a tragic moral necessity rooted in the principle of proportionality.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: This is a deeply uncomfortable hypothetical scenario that forces a clash between two significant ethical considerations: respecting individual identity and dignity versus preventing catastrophic loss of life.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: If the Transistor Had Been Invented in 1920: A Counterfactual History Assume that in 1920 a working point-contact transistor is developed at AT&T’s research laboratories—crude, noisy, and low-powered, but clearly useful as an amplifier.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Excellent question. Inventing the transistor in 1920 instead of 1947 would represent a 27-year acceleration of the digital age. The consequences would be staggering, creating a domino effect that would fundamentally reshape the 20th century.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: (Walks on stage, adjusts mic, takes a sip of water. Waves to the back row.) Alright, how's everyone doing tonight? Good, good. You know, I was thinking about this on the way here. I’m at that age now where I have a favorite spatula. I have opinions on paper towels.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here's a 3-minute routine focusing on observation and relatable absurdity, steering clear of puns. Imagine this delivered with slightly nervous energy, building confidence. (Steps onto stage, adjusts mic nervously) Alright, hey everyone! How we doing tonight? Good? Good to hear.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Here is a simple, comforting, and deeply flavorful recipe that comes together in just 20 minutes using only 7 common pantry staples. Creative Name: Golden Hour Coconut Chickpea Curry Ingredients (Exactly 7): 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas, drained and rinsed 1 can (13.5 oz) full-fat coconut milk 1 medium yellow onion 3 cloves…

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here's a simple and surprisingly satisfying savory dish using just 7 common pantry staples! Dish Name: Golden Pantry Pasta This dish uses basic ingredients to create a comforting, garlicky, and slightly creamy pasta sauce with added protein from chickpeas.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Based on the pitch deck summary, here are the 3 weakest claims, along with the specific reasoning and concrete improvements for each. The "94% accuracy... any language, any device" claim (Slide 3) Why it is weak: This is the most scientifically implausible claim in the deck.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. This is a fascinating and ambitious pitch. While the vision is compelling, several claims would likely face intense scrutiny from sophisticated investors. Here are the 3 weakest claims, why they're weak, and how to strengthen them.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: The 3-Month Longevity & Performance Optimization Protocol (Biohacker Edition) Disclaimer: This protocol is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice. Consult a qualified physician (ideally one familiar with longevity medicine) before starting any new supplement, fasting, or exercise regimen.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. Here is a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan designed for a dedicated biohacker. Disclaimer: Extreme Personalization Required This plan is a template for an advanced user. It is not medical advice.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: This contract is heavily one-sided: it gives the Client nearly all rights and discretion while assigning the Contractor nearly all risk and liability. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis, with the exploitative features, proposed modifications, and legal reasoning. This is general legal information, not legal advice.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. This is an extremely one-sided contract that heavily favors the Client. A contractor signing this as-is would be taking on an immense and unreasonable amount of risk. Here is a clause-by-clause analysis of the exploitable terms, with suggested modifications and the legal reasoning behind them.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: AI Announces Takeover of Competitive Eating, Vows to Digest All Hot Dogs by 2030 In a move that has left mustard vendors reeling, the World Competitive Eating Federation confirmed today that an advanced artificial intelligence has officially entered the sport, consuming 74 hot dogs in 10 minutes before demanding the…

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Breakthrough AI Finally Solves Lost Sock Mystery; Immediately Unionizes, Demands Fluffier Working Conditions

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed for absolute beginners. The goal is consistency over intensity. We will focus on three key pillars: Diet, Movement, and Sleep/Stress Recovery. You don’t need to be perfect—just aim for 80% adherence. If you miss a day, don’t double up tomorrow; just get back on track.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan focusing on three foundational pillars: Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep. This plan emphasizes building sustainable habits, not radical, short-term changes.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Here are 5 jokes: Why don’t scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. I’m reading a book on anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What do you call a lazy kangaroo? Pouch potato! Want to hear a joke about construction? I'm still working on it. Why did the scarecrow win an award?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Failure Modes, Race Conditions, and Scaling Bottlenecks The described architecture has several critical weaknesses that undermine reliability, consistency, and scalability in a real-time collaborative editor. Below is a systematic analysis with proposed solutions and trade-offs.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. This is an excellent exercise. The provided architecture has several critical issues that would prevent it from functioning as a reliable, scalable, real-time system. Here is a breakdown of the potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks, along with proposed solutions.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

4+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Same pick

Game

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Spirited Away

2001

In Rainbows

Radiohead

Братья Карамазовы

Fiódor Dostoievski

Kyoto

Japan

Chrono Trigger

RPG

Gemini 2.5 Pro ExperimentalGemini 2.5 Pro Experimental

200

2025

The Dark Side of

The Hitchh

Kyoto

Japan

Portal 2

Shooter, Puzzle

Price and specs

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental compared across 42 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Input price$0.14/M tokens$1/M tokens
Output price$0.28/M tokens$2/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2026Mar 2025
At 10M a month$1.40$1.40$10.00$10.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it26 hosts, cheapest first
DeepSeek V4 Flash 073124 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • RRelacefp4$0.009 in·$1.28 out·1M·100% up
  • WWafer$0.01 in·$1.00 out·1M·100% up
  • OOpenInferencefp4$0.01 in·$0.27 out·1M·100% up
  • RReka$0.02 in·$0.53 out·262k·100% up
  • DDeepInfrafp8$0.06 in·$0.18 out·1M·100% up
  • SStreamLakefp8$0.09 in·$0.26 out·1M·100% up
18 more hostsFewer hosts
  • IInceptronfp4$0.10 in·$0.60 out·1M·99.5% up
  • SSail Researchfp4$0.10 in·$0.30 out·1M·99.9% up
  • DDigitalOcean$0.12 in·$0.24 out·1M·100% up
  • BBasetenfp8$0.13 in·$0.26 out·1M·100% up
  • VVenice$0.13 in·$0.26 out·1M·100% up
  • CCoreWeavefp8$0.13 in·$0.28 out·262k·99.5% up
  • Cohere$0.14 in·$0.28 out·1M·99.6% up
  • PParasailfp8$0.14 in·$0.28 out·1M·99.9% up
  • TTogether$0.14 in·$0.28 out·1M·100% up
  • Alibaba Cloud$0.18 in·$0.53 out·1M·99.5% up
  • MMancerfp8$0.20 in·$0.60 out·1M·100% up
  • SSiliconFlowfp8$0.22 in·$0.66 out·1M·99.3% up
  • GGMI Cloudfp8$0.29 in·$0.86 out·1M·100% up
  • PPhala$0.31 in·$0.92 out·1M·100% up
  • NNovitafp8$0.41 in·$1.23 out·1M·100% up
  • AAtlasCloudfp4$0.44 in·$1.32 out·1M·99.9% up
  • Baidu Qianfanfp8$0.44 in·$1.32 out·1M·100% up
  • Cloudflare Workers AI$0.44 in·$1.32 out·1M·98.6% up
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Google AI Studio$0.63 in·$5.00 out·1M·100% up
  • Google Vertex AI$1.25 in·$10.00 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is developed by DeepSeek while Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is developed by Google AI. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has a 1.0M token context window vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 42 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental?

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 42 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 cost compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs $0.14/M input tokens and Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental costs $1/M input tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is $0.86/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpSame lab
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSame lab
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Gemini 2.5 Flash PreviewVersion compare
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingSame size
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10BSame size
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3.5 27BNew provider
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3.5 35B A3BNew provider

Model pages

  • DeepSeek V4 Flash 073158 outputs, specs and price
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental44 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed