Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. DeepSeek V4 FlashvsGLM 4 32B
Updated Apr 2026

DeepSeek V4 FlashvsGLM 4 32B

GLM 4 32B is cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash at $0.1/M vs $0.14/M input tokens.

DeepSeek V4 Flash and GLM 4 32B compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek V4 FlashGLM 4 32B
Input price$0.14/M tokens$0.1/M tokens
Output price$0.28/M tokens$0.1/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens128K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2026Jul 2025
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 54 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Futuristic Prediction

Predict how AI will change the film industry by 2035, considering deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation.

DeepSeek V4 Flash1,069 words
This is a fascinating question that touches on the core of creativity, labor, and technology. Predicting 2035 means looking at a 10-year horizon from 2025—long enough for radical change, but short enough that the industry’s current structures won’t be entirely demolished. By 2035, AI won't have replaced filmmaking.
Read the full answer
GLM 4 32B823 words
Okay, let's project how AI might reshape the film industry by 2035, focusing on deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation. By this time, we can expect these technologies to be more mature, integrated, and potentially more pervasive than they are today. Here's a breakdown of potential changes: 1.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

DeepSeek V4 Flash1,972 words
CEO’s 48-Hour Action Plan Context: I’ve just learned that our flagship chronic pain drug has a rare but serious liver failure risk (1 in 8,000 patients over 5 years), previously unknown. I have 48 hours until the board meeting and 72 hours until the earnings call.
Read the full answer
GLM 4 32B1,807 words
Okay, this is an incredibly challenging situation with immense pressure from multiple fronts. My priority is unwavering: patient safety comes first, followed by mitigating harm and navigating the crisis with integrity. Delay is not an option when patient safety is potentially compromised.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

DeepSeek V4 Flash1,987 words
If the transistor had been invented in 1920—a full 27 years earlier—its impact would ripple through every layer of technology, economics, and geopolitics, fundamentally reshaping the 20th century. Below is a detailed tracing of first-, second-, and third-order effects through 1980, organized by domain.
Read the full answer
GLM 4 32B1,590 words
Okay, let's rewind history and place the invention of the transistor firmly in 1920 instead of 1947. This is a massive shift with cascading effects. Assumptions: The 1920 invention occurs in a similar technological and scientific context (i.e., solid-state physics is nascent but the groundwork is there, perhaps through…
Read the full answer

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

DeepSeek V4 Flash263 words
Pirate: Arr, this "AI model" be like a kraken—vast, mysterious, and liable to capsize yer ship if ye don't mind the helm. But who's trainin' the beast? Knight: Forsooth, I would call it a golem. Forged not of clay and incantations, but of numbers and cold lightning.
Read the full answer
GLM 4 32B672 words
Setting: A bizarre, technicolor dimension where a pirate's ship, a medieval castle, and a 90s computer lab somehow coexist. Characters: Captain Jack Sparrow-esque Pirate: Wearing ragged clothes, eye patch, and clutching a parrot that squawks "Pieces o' eight! Pieces o' eight!"
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

DeepSeek V4 Flash696 words
(Strolls to center stage, adjusts mic, gives a weary smile to the audience) Thank you. Thank you so much. That’s very kind. I’m glad you’re all here. Because I have some news. I have finally figured out adulthood. It happened about six months ago. I bought a house.
Read the full answer
GLM 4 32B492 words
(Steps onto stage, takes a sip of water, looks out at the audience) Alright, alright. Thanks for having me. It's nice to be here. Feels good. Honestly, sometimes I forget what it feels like to be here. Like, physically. In a room. With other humans. It's been a thing lately, you know? Just...
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

DeepSeek V4 Flash442 words
LBO Model: HarborTech Services (HTS) – Base Case & Sensitivity Year-by-Year Financial Projections (FY2026–FY2030) ($ millions) FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue 972.00 1,040.04 1,102.44 1,157.56 1,215.44 EBITDA 136.08 156.01 176.39 191.00 206.63 Less: Cash Interest (64.80) (63.08) (60.08) (55.69) (50.16) –…
Read the full answer
GLM 4 32B391 words
Year-by-Year LBO Model (FY2026–FY2030) Metric FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue $972m $1,040m $1,102m $1,162m $1,218m EBITDA $136m $156m $177m $192m $207m Cash Interest (Term Loan) $43m $39m $34m $30m $26m Cash Interest (Mezz) $18m $16m $14m $12m $11m Cash Taxes $15m $22m $29m $35m $41m Capex $29m $31m $33m…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V4 Flash
DeepSeek V4 Flash
GLM 4 32B
GLM 4 32BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, DeepSeek V4 Flash has the edge: newer, bigger context window.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash
Input
$0.14
Output
$0.28
GLM 4 32B
Input
$0.10
1.4× cheaper
Output
$0.10
2.8× cheaper

GLM 4 32B is cheaper on both: 1.4× input, 2.8× output.

Where to run it

17 hosts, cheapest first

DeepSeek V4 Flash17 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
OOpenInferencefp8$0.05 in·$0.14 out·1M·100% upWWafer$0.07 in·$0.25 out·1M·99.9% upSStreamLakefp8$0.09 in·$0.18 out·1M·98.3% upDDeepInfrafp8$0.09 in·$0.18 out·1M·99.7% upGGMI Cloudfp8$0.09 in·$0.18 out·1M·99.9% upVVenice$0.10 in·$0.19 out·1M·99.7% up
11 more hostsFewer hosts
DDigitalOcean$0.10 in·$0.20 out·1M·100% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.13 in·$0.28 out·1M·0% upAlibaba Cloudfp8$0.13 in·$0.27 out·1M·99.8% upAAtlasCloudfp4$0.14 in·$0.28 out·1M·100% upBaidu Qianfanfp8$0.14 in·$0.28 out·1M·99.2% upNNovitafp8$0.14 in·$0.28 out·1M·99.9% upPParasailfp8$0.14 in·$0.28 out·1M·99.7% upNNextBitfp8$0.15 in·$0.35 out·1M·100% upMMancerfp8$0.19 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.2% upPPhala$0.20 in·$0.40 out·1M·99.9% upAzure AI Foundry$0.21 in·$0.56 out·1M·96.3% up
GLM 4 32B

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
52%

DeepSeek V4 Flash uses 4.1x more transitions

DeepSeek V4 Flash
GLM 4 32B
54%Vocabulary55%
17wSentence Length15w
0.52Hedging0.74
3.6Bold4.9
2.6Lists3.8
0.00Emoji0.00
0.41Headings0.35
0.19Transitions0.04
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

DeepSeek V4 Flash logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
GLM 4 32B logoGPT-6 Astra logo
GLM 4 32B vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Flash logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
GLM 4 32B logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
GLM 4 32B vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Flash logoHy4 Preview logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
GLM 4 32B logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
GLM 4 32B vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Flash logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
GLM 4 32B logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
GLM 4 32B vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

DeepSeek V4 Flash logoDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Same lab
DeepSeek V4 Flash logoDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Same lab
GLM 4 32B logoGLM 5.2 logo
GLM 4 32B vs GLM 5.2Same lab
GLM 4 32B logoGLM 5 logo
GLM 4 32B vs GLM 5Same lab
DeepSeek V4 Flash logoGrok 4.6 logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Grok 4.6Same size
DeepSeek V4 Flash logoGrok Code Fast 1 logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Grok Code Fast 1New provider
GLM 4 32B logoHealer Alpha logo
GLM 4 32B vs Healer AlphaNew provider
DeepSeek V4 Flash logoHorizon Alpha logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Horizon AlphaSame size

Model pages

DeepSeek V4 Flash logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash58 outputs, specs and price
GLM 4 32B logo
GLM 4 32B58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed