What is the difference between ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Thinking Machines: Inkling?

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is developed by Baidu while Thinking Machines: Inkling is developed by Thinking Machines. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has a 123K token context window vs Thinking Machines: Inkling's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B or Thinking Machines: Inkling?

It depends on your use case. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Thinking Machines: Inkling each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B cost compared to Thinking Machines: Inkling?

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B costs $0.28/M input tokens and Thinking Machines: Inkling costs $1/M input tokens. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is $0.72/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Thinking Machines: Inkling on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Thinking Machines: Inkling across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Thinking Machines: Inkling?

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is developed by Baidu while Thinking Machines: Inkling is developed by Thinking Machines. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has a 123K token context window vs Thinking Machines: Inkling's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B or Thinking Machines: Inkling?

It depends on your use case. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Thinking Machines: Inkling each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B cost compared to Thinking Machines: Inkling?

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B costs $0.28/M input tokens and Thinking Machines: Inkling costs $1/M input tokens. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is $0.72/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Thinking Machines: Inkling on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Thinking Machines: Inkling across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Thinking Machines: Inkling: Which Is Better?

Updated Jul 2026

Our Verdict

Thinking Machines: Inkling

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Thinking Machines: Inkling has the edge — newer, bigger context window.

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is 3.7x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B

Input

$0.28

3.6× cheaper

Output

$1.10

3.7× cheaper

Thinking Machines: Inkling

Input

$1.00

Output

$4.05

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper on both — 3.6× input, 3.7× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

46%

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B uses 24.2x more emoji

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B

Thinking Machines: Inkling

56%Vocabulary57%

18wSentence Length19w

0.63Hedging0.30

5.3Bold5.0

4.3Lists2.7

0.94Emoji0.04

0.67Headings0.49

0.15Transitions0.06

Based on 27 + 27 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Thinking Machines: Inkling have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs MiniMax M3New provider

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs GPT-5New provider

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

Updated Jul 2026

Our Verdict

Thinking Machines: Inkling

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Thinking Machines: Inkling has the edge — newer, bigger context window.

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is 3.7x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B

Input

$0.28

3.6× cheaper

Output

$1.10

3.7× cheaper

Thinking Machines: Inkling

Input

$1.00

Output

$4.05

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper on both — 3.6× input, 3.7× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

46%

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B uses 24.2x more emoji

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B

Thinking Machines: Inkling

56%Vocabulary57%

18wSentence Length19w

0.63Hedging0.30

5.3Bold5.0

4.3Lists2.7

0.94Emoji0.04

0.67Headings0.49

0.15Transitions0.06

Based on 27 + 27 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Thinking Machines: Inkling have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs MiniMax M3New provider

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs GPT-5New provider

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider