ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Compare ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B by Baidu against Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) by Qwen, context windows of 123K vs 1.0M, tested across 37 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is 3.6x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Input
$0.28
1.4× cheaper
Output
$1.10
3.6× cheaper
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Input
$0.40
Output
$4.00
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper on both — 1.4× input, 3.6× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
73%
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B uses 2.8x more emoji
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
56%Vocabulary54%
18wSentence Length15w
0.63Hedging0.36
5.3Bold7.0
4.3Lists4.6
0.94Emoji0.34
0.67Headings0.94
0.15Transitions0.09
Based on 27 + 18 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
