Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)vsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) at $0.11/M vs $0.175/M input tokens.
| Spec | Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.175/M tokens | $0.11/M tokens |
| Output price | $3.5/M tokens | $0.6/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 131K tokens |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jul 2025 |
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs 5.8x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)
Input
$0.17
Output
$3.50
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
1.6× cheaper
Output
$0.60
5.8× cheaper
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 1.6× input, 5.8× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
64%
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 53.9x more emoji
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
53%Vocabulary56%
14wSentence Length14w
0.38Hedging0.37
4.4Bold5.7
4.1Lists4.0
0.00Emoji0.54
0.00Headings0.70
0.24Transitions0.14
Based on 7 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) vs MiMo-V2-ProNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiMo-V2.5New provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) vs MiMo-V2.5-ProNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M1New provider