What is the difference between Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Thinking Machines: Inkling?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is developed by Google AI while Thinking Machines: Inkling is developed by Thinking Machines. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has a 262K token context window vs Thinking Machines: Inkling's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Thinking Machines: Inkling?

It depends on your use case. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Thinking Machines: Inkling each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B cost compared to Thinking Machines: Inkling?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens and Thinking Machines: Inkling costs $1/M input tokens. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is $0.87/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Thinking Machines: Inkling on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Thinking Machines: Inkling across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Thinking Machines: Inkling?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is developed by Google AI while Thinking Machines: Inkling is developed by Thinking Machines. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has a 262K token context window vs Thinking Machines: Inkling's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Thinking Machines: Inkling?

It depends on your use case. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Thinking Machines: Inkling each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B cost compared to Thinking Machines: Inkling?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens and Thinking Machines: Inkling costs $1/M input tokens. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is $0.87/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Thinking Machines: Inkling on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Thinking Machines: Inkling across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Thinking Machines: Inkling: Which Is Better?

Updated Jul 2026

Our Verdict

Thinking Machines: Inkling

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4BRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Thinking Machines: Inkling has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 10x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Input

$0.13

7.7× cheaper

Output

$0.40

10× cheaper

Thinking Machines: Inkling

Input

$1.00

Output

$4.05

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on both — 7.7× input, 10× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

60%

Thinking Machines: Inkling uses 3.9x more emoji

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Thinking Machines: Inkling

58%Vocabulary57%

18wSentence Length19w

0.31Hedging0.30

6.8Bold5.0

3.3Lists2.7

0.00Emoji0.04

0.74Headings0.49

0.15Transitions0.06

Based on 27 + 27 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Thinking Machines: Inkling have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiniMax M3New provider

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5New provider

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1New provider

Updated Jul 2026

Our Verdict

Thinking Machines: Inkling

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4BRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Thinking Machines: Inkling has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 10x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Input

$0.13

7.7× cheaper

Output

$0.40

10× cheaper

Thinking Machines: Inkling

Input

$1.00

Output

$4.05

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on both — 7.7× input, 10× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

60%

Thinking Machines: Inkling uses 3.9x more emoji

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Thinking Machines: Inkling

58%Vocabulary57%

18wSentence Length19w

0.31Hedging0.30

6.8Bold5.0

3.3Lists2.7

0.00Emoji0.04

0.74Headings0.49

0.15Transitions0.06

Based on 27 + 27 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Thinking Machines: Inkling have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiniMax M3New provider

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5New provider

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1New provider