What is the difference between GLM 4.6 and GLM 4.7 Flash?

Both are developed by Zhipu AI but target different use cases. GLM 4.6 has a 203K token context window vs GLM 4.7 Flash's 200K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GLM 4.6 or GLM 4.7 Flash?

It depends on your use case. GLM 4.6 and GLM 4.7 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GLM 4.6 cost compared to GLM 4.7 Flash?

GLM 4.6 costs $0.4/M input tokens and GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.07/M input tokens. GLM 4.7 Flash is $0.33/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GLM 4.6 and GLM 4.7 Flash on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4.6 and GLM 4.7 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Jan 2026

GLM 4.6vsGLM 4.7 Flash

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper than GLM 4.6 at $0.07/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

GLM 4.6 and GLM 4.7 Flash compared across 54 shared prompts
Spec	GLM 4.6	GLM 4.7 Flash
Input price	$0.4/M tokens	$0.07/M tokens
Output price	$1.75/M tokens	$0.4/M tokens
Context window	203K tokens	200K tokens
Weights	Open	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	No	No
Released	Sep 2025	Jan 2026
SWE-bench Verified	68.0%	59.2%