GLM 5.1vsKimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is cheaper than GLM 5.1 at $0.3/M vs $1.4/M input tokens.
| Spec | GLM 5.1 | Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.4/M tokens | $0.3/M tokens |
| Output price | $4.4/M tokens | $0.6/M tokens |
| Context window | 203K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Nov 2025 |
Our Verdict
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
GLM 5.1Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct costs 7.3x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GLM 5.1
Input
$1.40
Output
$4.40
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Input
$0.30
4.7× cheaper
Output
$0.60
7.3× cheaper
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is cheaper on both — 4.7× input, 7.3× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
61%
GLM 5.1 uses 2.3x more transitions
GLM 5.1
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
54%Vocabulary63%
18wSentence Length15w
0.31Hedging0.19
3.6Bold5.2
2.6Lists3.2
0.00Emoji0.00
0.43Headings0.38
0.11Transitions0.05
Based on 27 + 14 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct vs MiniMax M3New provider
GLM 5.1 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
GLM 5.1 vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
GLM 5.1 vs GPT-5New provider
GLM 5.1 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507New provider
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct vs Qwen3 CoderNew provider
GLM 5.1 vs Qwen3 Coder FlashNew provider
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder NextNew provider