Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-4.5vsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Updated Jul 2025

GPT-4.5vsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than GPT-4.5 at $0.11/M vs $75/M input tokens.

GPT-4.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 compared across 25 shared prompts
SpecGPT-4.5Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input price$75/M tokens$0.11/M tokens
Output price$150/M tokens$0.6/M tokens
Context window128K tokens131K tokens
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedFeb 2025Jul 2025
Our Verdict
GPT-4.5
GPT-4.5
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs 250x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-4.5
Input
$75.00
Output
$150.00
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
682× cheaper
Output
$0.60
250× cheaper

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both: 682× input, 250× output.

Where to run it

3 hosts, cheapest first

GPT-4.5

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 25073 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.23 in·$2.30 out·131k·100% upNNovitafp8$0.30 in·$3.00 out·131k·98.8% upVVenicefp8$0.45 in·$3.50 out·128k·95.2% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
47%

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 98.9x more emoji

GPT-4.5
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
63%Vocabulary56%
16wSentence Length15w
0.57Hedging0.42
4.7Bold6.1
6.4Lists4.3
0.00Emoji0.99
1.30Headings0.70
0.54Transitions0.13
Based on 11 + 28 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoOx Alpha logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoLlama 4 Maverick logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoGPT-5 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5Cross-provider
GPT-4.5 logoMiniMax M3 logo
GPT-4.5 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoGPT-5.3-Codex logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5.3-CodexCross-provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoGPT-5.4 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5.4Cross-provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoGPT-5.4 Mini logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5.4 MiniCross-provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoGPT-5.4 Nano logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5.4 NanoCross-provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed