xAI: Grok 4
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
xAI: Grok 4 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare xAI: Grok 4 by xAI against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, in 14 community votes, qwen: qwen3 235b a22b thinking 2507 wins 79% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 256K vs 131K, tested across 33 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, xAI: Grok 4 or Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is the better choice overall, winning 79% of 14 blind community votes on Rival. xAI: Grok 4 costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.11/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. Context windows: 256K vs 131K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between xAI: Grok 4 and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
xAI: Grok 4 is made by xai while Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is from qwen. xAI: Grok 4 has a 256K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's 131K. On pricing, xAI: Grok 4 costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.11/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. In community voting, In 14 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 79% of head-to-head duels.
In 14 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 79% of head-to-head duels. xAI: Grok 4 leads in Image Generation, while Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 leads in Web Design, Conversation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 14+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Web Design: Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 83% of votes
Image Generation: xAI: Grok 4 wins 67% of votes
Conversation: Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Winner
xAI: Grok 4Runner-up
Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. In 14 blind votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 79% of the time. That's not luck.
Pick xAI: Grok 4 for Image Generation. Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for Conversation, Web Design. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 25x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
97%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 7.7x more emoji
xAI: Grok 4
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
53%Vocabulary56%
18wSentence Length14w
0.67Hedging0.37
2.7Bold5.7
2.7Lists4.0
0.07Emoji0.54
0.86Headings0.70
0.04Transitions0.14
Based on 21 + 22 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
FAQ