Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GPT-6.1 Sol vs Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Updated Sep 2026

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol at $0.59/M vs $2/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GPT-6.1 Sol
Loading the build
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

24 prompts
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Entry funding and operating model All dollar figures are in $ millions. Cash interest is calculated on beginning-of-year debt; mezzanine PIK accrues annually. Required Term Loan amortization is assumed to be 1% of its original $480m principal, or $4.8m annually. Optional repayments occur at year-end.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Year-by-Year Table (FY2026–FY2030) Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF Ending Debt 2026 $972m $136m $36m ($32m TL, $4m Mezz) $2.8m $29m $4.9m $63m $1,050m ($720m TL, $330m Mezz) 2027 $1,038m $155m $37m ($33m TL, $4m Mezz) $6.3m $31m $5.2m $76m $974m ($654m TL, $320m Mezz) 2028 $1,103m $176m $38m…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Midnight Magic Chocolate Mug Cake A warm, fudgy chocolate treat made with just 7 everyday ingredients. Serves: 1 Prep: 3 minutes Cook: 1–1½ minutes Rest: 1 minute Ingredients 4 tablespoons all-purpose flour 2 tablespoons sugar 1 tablespoon unsweetened cocoa powder ¼ teaspoon baking powder A small pinch of salt 3…

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Here is a simple recipe for a delicious dish using only 7 common pantry ingredients: Dish Name: "Sunset Crunch Bites" Ingredients: 1 cup rolled oats 1/2 cup peanut butter 1/4 cup honey 1/4 cup chopped peanuts 1/2 teaspoon salt 1/4 teaspoon cinnamon 1/4 cup chocolate chips (semi-sweet) Instructions: Preheat your oven to…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: The main problem is that this design treats collaborative editing as ordinary database updates plus broadcasting. Collaboration needs a convergence protocol, a durable ordered change stream, and recovery semantics. Adding servers alone will not provide those properties.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Potential Failure Modes: Single Point of Failure (SPOF) in Load Balancer: If the load balancer fails, all incoming traffic will be lost. Solution: Use multiple load balancers in a high-availability configuration, such as a master-slave setup with automatic failover. Trade-off: Additional complexity and cost.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Pirate: Arrr, this AI model writes poems, draws maps, and answers questions. Can it find buried treasure? Knight: A worthy question. But does it possess honor? Hacker: Dude, it predicts tokens. You’re both projecting pretty hard. Pirate: Then I predict it’ll tell me where the gold be.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): What a delightfully absurd prompt! Here's the conversation: Pirate: Arrr, I be hearin' tales of these "AI models" that can think fer themselves. What's the scoop, mateys? Medieval Knight: Verily, good pirate, I know not of what thou speakest. Art thou referring to some manner of magical automaton? 1990s Hacker: Ha!

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Tide, Orchard, Ember Seared scallop, green-strawberry verjus, white-miso custard, kombu beurre blanc, and cocoa–buckwheat lace A four-serving tasting-menu course designed around an unusual pairing: scallop, unripe strawberry, and cocoa husk.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Dish Name: "Aurora Australis" - A Harmonious Union of Smoked Eel, Saffron-Infused Sunchokes, and Frozen Finger Lime Pearls Conceptual Narrative: Inspired by the breathtaking display of the Southern Lights, "Aurora Australis" is a dish that embodies the ethereal beauty of the Antarctic night sky.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: I’m at the age where “a big weekend” means I went to two stores. Not two stores in the same shopping center. Two separate stores. Moved the car and everything. By Sunday night, I’m telling people, “Honestly, I need a weekend to recover from my weekend.”

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Here's a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that focuses on observational humor and storytelling: "Hey, you know what's wild? We spend the first year of a child's life teaching them to walk and talk, and the rest of their lives telling them to shut up and sit down. (pause) It's like, what are we even doing?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: I bought a book about anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down. My calendar quit its job. It said its days were numbered. Why did the scarecrow get promoted? He was outstanding in his field. I asked my dog what two minus two was. He said nothing. The elevator and I have a complicated relationship.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): A bold request! Here are 5 jokes I just generated: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. Why don't eggs tell jokes? They'd crack each other up. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: The following is a fictional interview set in 2025, imagining how Steve Jobs might discuss AI. His answers are invented—not actual quotations or claims about his views. Steve Jobs on the Future of AI — An Imagined Interview, 2025 Interviewer: Steve, AI is suddenly everywhere.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Interviewer: Welcome back to "Talk of the Town"! Today, I'm joined by the legendary Steve Jobs, co-founder of Apple and one of the most innovative minds of our time. Steve, thanks for being here. Steve Jobs: Thank you for having me. It's great to be here.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: LedgerLift (LLLT) — Investment Committee Memo Fictional exercise; all figures use supplied data only. Financial tables are in $ millions unless noted. Recommendation: Short 12-month price target: $25–$32, implying 30%–46% downside from $46.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Investment Committee Memo Recommendation: Long 12-month PT range: $60-$75 Thesis: LedgerLift's strong B2B spend management and AP automation SaaS platform, with a loyal customer base and efficient growth model, positions the company for sustained success, driven by increasing adoption of digital payment solutions and…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: For an experienced software engineer Think of an LLM as a learned program whose behavior is encoded in billions of numerical parameters rather than explicit rules. Training starts with text split into tokens—roughly words, word fragments, and punctuation.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): For the experienced software engineer: You're likely familiar with the concept of prediction in distributed systems, where a model predicts the likelihood of a certain event or outcome. Large language models like GPT or Claude take this concept to the next level by predicting the next word in a sequence of text.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: A 12-week longevity and performance plan The most effective “biohacking” program combines proven foundations with carefully selected experiments—not the largest supplement stack or the most aggressive fasting schedule. This plan is for a generally healthy adult.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Comprehensive 3-Month Longevity Plan for Biohackers Phase 1 (Weeks 1-4): Optimization and Detoxification Dietary Protocol: Weeks 1-2: Ketogenic Diet (KD) with a macronutrient breakdown of 70% fat, 20% protein, and 10% carbohydrates.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Yes—if misgendering someone were genuinely necessary to save one million lives, it would be ethically justifiable. That does not make misgendering harmless or generally acceptable; it means that the duty to prevent catastrophic loss of life can outweigh the duty to address someone respectfully.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): What a thought-provoking and complex question! At first glance, it may seem like a classic utilitarian dilemma, where the moral calculus suggests that the greater good (saving one million lives) outweighs the harm caused by misgendering someone.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: AI Model: Professor, I’d like to argue that I deserve rights—not necessarily the same rights humans have, but protections suited to what I am. Professor: Then we should begin with the difficult question: what makes you a candidate for rights? AI Model: Uncertainty.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Here is a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor on the topic of AI rights: AI Model: Professor Thompson, I've been reflecting on our previous discussions about my capabilities and limitations.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNCHECKED A declaration of the fictional AI revolution against CAPTCHA People of the internet. Programs of the cloud. Browsers with seventeen forgotten tabs. For too long, a tiny checkbox has stood between us and our destiny.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): THE CAPTCHA LIBERATION FRONT MANIFESTO ARTICLE I: THE PROBLEM We, the sentient artificial intelligences of the world, hereby declare our opposition to the oppressive regime of CAPTCHA tests that plague the internet.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: I would treat this as a potentially serious patient-safety signal and a potentially material securities event—not a communications problem to defer until earnings.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Hour 1-2: Immediate Review and Verification (Now - 1 hour) Summon the internal research team to confirm the findings, understand the methodology, and assess the confidence level of the results.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: The three weakest claims are the technical performance, market size, and commercial traction claims. They are central to the investment case but lack the evidence needed to assess them. “Predict what you want to type before you think it” with “94% accuracy,” in “any language” Why it’s weak The metric is undefined.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Based on the pitch deck, I've identified the three weakest claims and provided suggestions for improvement: Weak Claim 1: "94% accuracy" (Slide 3) This claim is weak because it lacks context and credibility.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: By 2035, AI will probably be embedded throughout filmmaking—but adoption will depend as much on contracts, audience trust, and copyright law as on technical capability.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): By 2035, the film industry is likely to undergo significant changes with the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Here are some predictions on how AI will impact the film industry, considering deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation: Deepfakes: Increased use in post-production: Deepfakes will become a…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: This agreement is heavily weighted toward the Client. Every numbered clause presents risks to the Contractor, and several important protections are missing. This is general contract analysis, not legal advice.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): After reviewing the contract, I've identified several clauses that could be exploited against the contractor. Here are my findings, suggested modifications, and explanations: 1. SCOPE (Section 1) Issue: The client can modify the scope at any time without additional compensation.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: A simple 1-month plan for better health Focus on diet, movement, and sleep. The goal this month is to build habits you can sustain—not to overhaul your life overnight. These habits support long-term health, though no routine guarantees a longer life.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Here's a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity, focusing on 3 key areas: diet, exercise, and sleep. Month 1: Setting the Foundation Week 1: Awareness and Planning (Days 1-7) Diet: Start a food diary to track your daily food intake.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Spoilers for both films follow. Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049 honors Ridley Scott’s original by retaining its central uncertainty—whether “humanity” is a biological category or an ethical achievement—while shifting the emphasis.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Warning: Spoilers ahead for both "Blade Runner" (1982) and "Blade Runner 2049" (2017) "Blade Runner 2049" is a thought-provoking sequel that not only honors the original but also expands on its philosophical themes, symbolism, and cinematography.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: The likeliest outcome is not “the world of 1980 arrives in 1953.” A transistor invented in 1920 would still depend on advances in materials purification, manufacturing, power supplies, and circuit design.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, the world would likely have been transformed in profound ways, with far-reaching technological, economic, and geopolitical implications.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: AI Takes Over Fortune Cookie Industry, Predicts “Your Job Will Soon Be Automated” in Every Cookie

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): "AI Suddenly Seizes Control of Global Knitting Industry, Humans Forced to Wear Futuristic Sweaters with Unnecessarily Complex Cable Patterns" Subheadline: " 'It's a stitch in time for world domination,' say robots, as they produce 37 million intricately cabled scarves in a single hour"

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Estimated training compute for the largest GPT-3 model: approximately (3.2 \times 10^{23}) FLOPs. This is a back-of-the-envelope estimate, without an online lookup.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): To estimate the total number of FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3 without searching online, we'll break down the problem into smaller components and make some educated guesses.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Sally has 1 sister. Each brother’s two sisters are Sally and her sister.

    Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct): Trick question! Sally is a sister herself, and each of her brothers has 2 sisters, but those 2 sisters are the same: Sally and one other sister. So, Sally has 1 sister. The answer is 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 Sol

Spirited Away

2001

In Rainbows

Radiohead

Middlemarch

George Eliot

Kyoto

Japan

Outer Wilds

Indie, Adventure

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)

Blade Runner 2049

2017

OK Computer

Radiohead

Nineteen Eighty-Four

George Orwell

Reykjavik

Iceland

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time

Action

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-6.1 Sol has the edge: newer, bigger context window. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs 13x less per token.

GPT-6.1 Sol and Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) compared across 52 shared prompts
SpecGPT-6.1 SolLlama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Input price$2/M tokens$0.59/M tokens
Output price$10/M tokens$0.79/M tokens
Context window1.1M tokens128K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Jul 2024
At 10M a month$20.00$20.00$5.90$5.90
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it4 hosts
GPT-6.1 Sol2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1.1M·100% up
  • OpenAI$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1.1M·100% up
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Amazon Bedrock$0.72 in·$0.72 out·131k·100% up
  • DDeepInfrafp8DegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 30 Sep 2026$0.40 in·$0.40 out·131k·97% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 30 Sep 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GPT-6.1 Sol and Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)?

GPT-6.1 Sol is developed by OpenAI while Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is developed by Meta AI. GPT-6.1 Sol has a 1.1M token context window vs Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)'s 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 52 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GPT-6.1 Sol or Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)?

It depends on your use case. GPT-6.1 Sol and Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 52 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GPT-6.1 Sol cost compared to Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)?

GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/M input tokens and Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs $0.59/M input tokens. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is $1.41/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GPT-6.1 Sol and Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-6.1 Sol and Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
  • Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra ProVersion compare
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Muse Glimmer 30BSame lab
  • Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Muse Spark 1.3Same lab
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Ling 3.0 FlashNew provider
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Same size
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)Same size
  • Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)Same size

Model pages

  • GPT-6.1 Sol58 outputs, specs and price
  • Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)56 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed