Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent BetavsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta at $0.11/M vs $2/M input tokens.
| Spec | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $2/M tokens | $0.11/M tokens |
| Output price | $6/M tokens | $0.6/M tokens |
| Context window | 2.0M tokens | 131K tokens |
| Released | Mar 2026 | Jul 2025 |
Our Verdict
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs 10x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
18× cheaper
Output
$0.60
10× cheaper
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 18× input, 10× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
37%
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 53.9x more emoji
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
59%Vocabulary56%
16wSentence Length14w
0.41Hedging0.37
2.7Bold5.7
2.4Lists4.0
0.00Emoji0.54
0.26Headings0.70
0.02Transitions0.14
Based on 23 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.5New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.6New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.7New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.8New provider