What is the difference between Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta AI while Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is developed by Qwen. Llama 4 Scout has a 10.0M token context window vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's 131K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

It depends on your use case. Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Llama 4 Scout cost compared to Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Llama 4 Scout costs $0.25/M input tokens and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.11/M input tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is $0.14/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Jul 2025

Llama 4 ScoutvsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Llama 4 Scout at $0.11/M vs $0.25/M input tokens.

Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 compared across 54 shared prompts
Spec	Llama 4 Scout	Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input price	$0.25/M tokens	$0.11/M tokens
Output price	$0.5/M tokens	$0.6/M tokens
Context window	10.0M tokens	131K tokens
Weights	Open	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	No	No
Released	Apr 2025	Jul 2025