Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Compare Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 by Meta AI against Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 131K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge — newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is 5.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Input
$1.25
Output
$4.25
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input
$0.20
6.3× cheaper
Output
$0.80
5.3× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper on both — 6.3× input, 5.3× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
38%
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 uses 103.6x more emoji
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
61%Vocabulary55%
20wSentence Length18w
0.10Hedging0.52
3.7Bold6.7
2.0Lists4.3
0.01Emoji1.04
0.52Headings0.92
0.02Transitions0.11
Based on 29 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
