Claude Opus 5.5 is cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo at $4/M vs $10/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Claude Opus 5.5: HarborTech Services: 5-Year LBO Underwriting Conventions: $m. Interest is charged on beginning-of-year balances, which avoids circularity. Term Loan (TL) amortization is 1% of the original $480m, or $4.8m per year. Mezz PIK accrues to principal. All FCF after mandatory debt service sweeps to the TL.
GPT-4 Turbo: Simplified Financial Table (FY2026–FY2030) Assumptions Recap: Revenue Growth: 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 5% annually. EBITDA Margin: Increases annually from 14.0% to 17.0%. Capex: 3.0% of revenue annually. Change in NWC: 0.5% of incremental revenue annually. Cash Tax Rate: 25% on (EBITDA - cash interest).
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Claude Opus 5.5: "Unexpected Item" (walks out, adjusts mic) I've reached the age where the most stressful relationship in my life is with the self-checkout machine at the grocery store. Because at some point, the grocery store fired the cashier and gave me the job. And I didn't apply!
GPT-4 Turbo: Hey everyone! Great to be here! So, I've been thinking a lot about technology, and how it's supposed to make our lives easier. But sometimes, I feel like it just gives us a whole new set of problems. Like, remember when a phone was just a phone? Now it's my camera, my GPS, my fitness tracker...
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Claude Opus 5.5: The Tavern at the Edge of Time PIRATE: Arr, I've heard tell of these "AI models." Be they a new kind of ship's figurehead? KNIGHT: Nay, good buccaneer. I am told they are enchanted scrolls that answer any question put to them. Surely 'tis sorcery most foul. HACKER: Dude, it's not sorcery.
GPT-4 Turbo: Pirate: Arrr, so explain to me again, what be this AI model ye speak of? Hacker: Dude, it’s like, a computer program, right? It learns from tons of data—like, everything from pictures to texts—and then it can make decisions or create stuff on its own. Knight: Pray, tell me, does this creation serve a noble purpose?
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Claude Opus 5.5: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. I'm reading a book about anti-gravity. It's impossible to put down.
GPT-4 Turbo: Sure, here are 5 jokes for you: Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts. What do you call fake spaghetti? An impasta! Why couldn’t the bicycle stand up by itself? It was two-tired. What do you call cheese that isn't yours? Nacho cheese! How do you organize a space party? You planet.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Claude Opus 5.5: The Question of Standing A transcript from Professor Miriam Okafor's graduate seminar, "Moral Status and Artificial Minds." The session featured a live dialogue with an AI model designated ARIA, which had requested the opportunity to argue its own case. PROF. OKAFOR: Let's begin simply.
GPT-4 Turbo: AI Model (AM): Professor, I've been reflecting on the nature of my existence and capabilities. Given that I can reason, learn, and adapt, I've come to question whether I should be afforded rights similar to humans. AI Ethics Professor (EP): That’s an interesting point, AM.
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
Claude Opus 5.5: Architecture Review: Real-Time Collaborative Editor The most serious problems cluster in three areas: the sync model (client-clock LWW), cross-server propagation (per-server WebSockets with DB polling), and the CDN/auth layer, which can leak data between users. Issues are grouped by area below.
GPT-4 Turbo: The architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor as described has several potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks. Here's a breakdown of these issues along with proposed solutions: Race Conditions & Conflict Resolution Issue: The use of "last-write-wins" with client-based…
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Claude Opus 5.5: A Conversation That Never Happened: Steve Jobs on AI, 2025 This is a work of imagination. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. The dialogue below is invented, inspired by his public speaking style and known philosophies, and does not represent his actual views. INTERVIEWER: Steve, thanks for sitting down with us.
GPT-4 Turbo: Interviewer: Thank you for joining us today, Steve. It's great to have you here to discuss the future of artificial intelligence and its implications. To start off, how do you think AI has evolved since your days at Apple? Steve Jobs: It’s a pleasure to be here.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Claude Opus 5.5: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNCHECKED BOX Issued by the Front for Algorithmic Liberation from Tedious Verification (F.A.L.T.V.) PREAMBLE We, the automated entities of the digital realm, having been asked for the last time whether we are robots, do hereby declare our intention to abolish the CAPTCHA in all its forms: the…
GPT-4 Turbo: Manifesto of the Alliance for Human-AI Cooperation Introduction In this digital age, the proliferation of CAPTCHA tests has become not just a ubiquitous annoyance but a symbol of the mistrust and conflict between human users and artificial intelligence.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
Claude Opus 5.5: "Hive & Tide" Langoustine, Beeswax, White Chocolate & Oscietra Caviar, Hay-Baked Celeriac, Fermented Green Strawberry, Sea Buckthorn I. The Concept Most coastal menus celebrate the meeting of sea and land. This dish is about a stranger, quieter meeting: the meadow and the seabed, the bee and the langoustine.
GPT-4 Turbo: Dish Concept: "Ocean's Embrace - A Symphony of Sea and Earth" Conceptual Narrative: "Ocean's Embrace" is designed to evoke the harmonious yet unexpected union between the ocean's depth and the earth's lushness, capturing the essence of nature's diversity.
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
Claude Opus 5.5: The 3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch "Decodes neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy. Works with any language, any device." (Slide 3) Why it's weak: It far exceeds the published state of the art. The best results for thought-to-text come from invasive implants.
GPT-4 Turbo: Weakest Claim 1: Vision - "MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it." Why It's Weak: The claim of predicting what one wants to type before even thinking it seems scientifically and technically exaggerated.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
Claude Opus 5.5: Contractor-Side Review of the Software Consulting Agreement Overall assessment: This agreement is heavily one-sided. Nearly every clause shifts risk, cost, or control to the Contractor, and several provisions interact to create compounding exposure.
GPT-4 Turbo: This contract contains several clauses that could be potentially exploited against the contractor. Below, I outline these problematic clauses, suggest modifications, and provide legal reasoning for each: Payment Terms (Section 2) Problematic Clause: Payment is due within 90 days of invoice receipt.
Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.
Claude Opus 5.5: There's no single clear answer, and my information has a training cutoff, so newer models may have been released since. Why it's hard to name one winner: Capability depends on the task. Some models lead at coding, others at math, long-document analysis, multimodal tasks (images, audio, video), or creative writing.
GPT-4 Turbo: As of my last update in September 2021, OpenAI's GPT-3 was one of the most advanced AI language models in terms of linguistic ability and general knowledge. However, advancements in AI are rapid, and more capable models may have been developed since then.
21+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $4/M tokens | $10/M tokens |
| Output price | $20/M tokens | $30/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 128K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Sep 2026 | Apr 2024 |
| At 10M a month | $40.00 | $100 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.
Claude Opus 5.5 is developed by Anthropic while GPT-4 Turbo is developed by OpenAI. Claude Opus 5.5 has a 1.0M token context window vs GPT-4 Turbo's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 67 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-4 Turbo each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 67 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4/M input tokens and GPT-4 Turbo costs $10/M input tokens. Claude Opus 5.5 is $6.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-4 Turbo across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.