Z.ai: GLM 5 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Compare Z.ai: GLM 5 by Zhipu AI against Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI, context windows of 203K vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Z.ai: GLM 5 or Llama 4 Maverick?
Z.ai: GLM 5 and Llama 4 Maverick are both competitive models. Z.ai: GLM 5 costs $0.8/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick. Context windows: 203K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Z.ai: GLM 5 and Llama 4 Maverick
Z.ai: GLM 5 is made by zhipu while Llama 4 Maverick is from meta. Z.ai: GLM 5 has a 203K token context window compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1000K. On pricing, Z.ai: GLM 5 costs $0.8/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick.
Per 1M tokens
Z.ai: GLM 5 wins input (1.9× cheaper)·Llama 4 Maverick
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Style Comparison
Llama 4 Maverick uses 2.0x more hedging
