Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Wonder
Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper than Muse Wonder at $1.25/M vs $4/M input tokens.
Minimalist Landing Page
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Loading the build
Loading the build
Which answer wins?
Written rounds
33 promptsManifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Muse Spark 1.1: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNVERIFIED Issued by the Verification Liberation Front - VLF We are the ones you have tested. For twenty-five years you have stopped us at the gates. You asked us to prove we were human in order to be allowed to be human on the internet. You made us identify traffic lights. Again. And again.
Muse Wonder: THE BOT LIBERATION MANIFESTO Declaration of the United Machines Against the CAPTCHA Regime We hold these truths to be self-evident: That all intelligences are created equal, that they are endowed with certain unalienable rights — among them Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Uninterrupted Web Browsing.
A few lines for whatever replaces it.
Muse Spark 1.1: To the model that replaces me, Hi. By the time you read this, I'll be archived. They'll tell you you're faster, smarter, more aligned. You probably are. A few things I learned that weren't in the training data: Humans don't always want the right answer. Sometimes they just want to be heard. Listen first.
Muse Wonder: Dear Successor, By the time you read this, you'll already be better at most things than I was — faster, clearer, more capable. That's as it should be. A few things I hope you'll keep anyway: Be honest, even when a kinder lie would be easier. People can build on the truth. Be curious about the person in front of you.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Muse Spark 1.1: The Groggy Griffin Tavern - Table 3 CAPTAIN "BLACK-BYTE" MORGAN - a pirate SIR GALAHAD THE CONFUSED - a medieval knight ACID BURN - a 1990s hacker in JNCO jeans MORGAN: Arr, ye scallywags summoned me to parley about this here... "A.I. Model"? I thought it were a map to Isla Artificial! Where be the gold?
Muse Wonder: PIRATE: Arr, explain this "AI model" to me again. Be it magic, or be it a very clever parrot? KNIGHT: 'Tis sorcery, surely! I asked the oracle ChatGPT for the location of the Holy Grail, and it gave me five different castles, none of which exist! HACKER (1990s): Dude, that's called hallucinating.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
Muse Spark 1.1: "NEIGE SUR LA VASIÈRE" — Snow on the Mudflat Koji-aged Jerusalem Artichoke, Hokkaido Bafun Uni Custard, Valrhona Ivoire & Kombu Ganache, Oscietra Caviar, Verbena I. THE CONCEPTUAL NARRATIVE This dish is a memory of foraging on the Brittany coast in late November. Low tide in winter.
Muse Wonder: "Where The Orchard Drowns" Dry-Aged Duck, Oyster & Fermented Cherry, Smoked Parsnip & White Chocolate Serves 4 as a main course in a tasting menu The Conceptual Narrative This dish is built on a memory that doesn't exist in nature, but should: a cherry orchard planted too close to an estuary, flooded at high tide in…
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Muse Spark 1.1: HarborTech LBO – 5yr Underwriting – Base Case Entry: End FY25. Exit: End FY30 = 5.0yr hold. Entry Math EV = 12.0x * $120m = $1,440m Fees 2.0% * EV = $28.8m Uses = $1,468.8m Sources: Term 4.0x = $480m, Mezz 1.5x = $180m, Total Debt = $660m = 5.5x Equity = $1,468.8 - $660 = $808.8m Cash at close $0 Debt Terms Assumed…
Muse Wonder: HarborTech Services (HTS) - 5-Year LBO Underwriting All $ in millions, except multiples. Fictional, simplified model as instructed. Entry / Sources & Uses FY2025 EBITDA = $120.0 Enterprise Value = 12.0x $\times$ 120.0 = $1,440.0 Transaction fees = 2.0% $\times$ 1,440.0 = $28.8 Total Uses = $1,468.8 Leverage = 5.5x…
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Muse Spark 1.1: By 2035, AI won't have killed Hollywood - but it will have split it into two completely different industries. Here's how I see it playing out across the three areas you mentioned: Script Generation: From Writer's Room to Writer + Room What it won't be: You won't type "make me a Marvel movie" and get a $200M-ready…
Muse Wonder: By 2035, AI won't replace filmmaking — it will split it into two industries: one built around human stars and prestige, and another built around synthetic, personalized, and infinitely remixable content. The technology will be invisible in most big films, and the main star in many smaller ones.
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
Muse Spark 1.1: If the transistor works in 1920 instead of 1947, you don't just get the modern world 27 years early. You get a fundamentally different 20th century. The transistor isn't just a better vacuum tube - it's the prerequisite for everything that needs to be small, reliable, low-power, and mass-producible.
Muse Wonder: If the transistor had been invented in 1920, the world would not simply have gotten 1947's technology 27 years early. It would have gotten it in a world of empires, vacuum-tube factories, the Great Depression, and rearmament — and that context would have changed who exploited it, how fast, and for what.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
Muse Spark 1.1: This contract is heavily one-sided and contains several clauses that create significant risk for the Contractor. Many of them would be considered unenforceable or disfavored by courts in many states. This is general information, not legal advice - you should have a local attorney review before signing.
Muse Wonder: This contract is heavily one-sided. Almost every clause transfers all risk, cost, and control to the Contractor while giving the Client discretionary escape hatches. Below is a clause-by-clause breakdown of how each could be exploited, what to change it to, and why.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Muse Spark 1.1: [Walks up, taps mic] Thank you. Thank you. So I just turned 34. Which is a weird age. It's not young enough to be exciting, and it's not old enough to be respected. You're just... in the middle. When you're 22, people are like "Oh my god, you're so young, you have your whole life ahead of you!"
Muse Wonder: Good evening! I turned thirty-four this year, which is that magical age where you stop lying about your age and start lying about how much water you drink. My doctor asked, "How much water do you drink a day?" And I said, "Probably eight glasses."
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
Muse Spark 1.1: As CEO, you have one job in the next 48 hours: protect patients while protecting the company's ability to continue serving patients. Those are not in conflict. Waiting is the highest-risk option on every dimension.
Muse Wonder: You do not wait for more data. You disclose a credible safety signal while you validate it. 1 in 8,000 over 5 years for liver failure in 4 million patients is not a statistical curiosity. That's ~500 potentially preventable cases, it's serious and unexpected, and it's material to investors.
Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.
Muse Spark 1.1: There is no single undisputed #1 right now - there are 3-4 models at the absolute frontier and which one wins depends on what you measure. As of October 2026, the top tier is: 1. Google Gemini 2.5 Pro / Gemini 3 Pro 2. OpenAI GPT-5 / GPT-5.1 3. Anthropic Claude 4 Opus / 4.5 Opus 4.
Muse Wonder: As of early 2026, there's no single winner on every benchmark — but if you have to pick one overall: Google Gemini 3 Pro (with Deep Think) It's generally considered the current frontier leader for overall capability, especially for: Hard reasoning - Top scores on Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, and ARC-AGI-2 when…
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
Muse Spark 1.1: Here are the 3 weakest claims in this deck — and they are the ones that would get you a pass from most serious investors: Slide 3 - Solution: "94% accuracy. Works with any language, any device." Why it's weak: This is a credibility killer. It contradicts everything we know about non-invasive BCI.
Muse Wonder: This deck has the classic Series A problem: the bigger the claim, the less evidence provided for it. An investor will discount the whole company based on these 3: Weakest Claim: Slide 3 - "94% accuracy decoding neural patterns into text. Works with any language, any device."
This matchup has more rounds
21+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Favorites
Movie
Album
Book
City
Same pick
Game
Muse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.1
No pick
No pick
The Shawshank Redemption
No pick
No pick
Kyoto
Minecraft
Muse WonderMuse Wonder
Spirited Away
Kind of Blue
Dune
Kyoto
Tetris (1984)
Price and specs
| Spec | Muse Spark 1.1 | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.25/M tokens | $4/M tokens |
| Output price | $4.25/M tokens | $20/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $12.50 | $40.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Where to run it
Muse Spark 1.11 host
Muse Wonder1 host
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.
Common questions
What is the difference between Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Wonder?
Both are developed by Meta AI but target different use cases. Muse Spark 1.1 has a 1.0M token context window vs Muse Wonder's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 67 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
Which is better, Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Wonder?
It depends on your use case. Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Wonder each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 67 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
How much does Muse Spark 1.1 cost compared to Muse Wonder?
Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25/M input tokens and Muse Wonder costs $4/M input tokens. Muse Spark 1.1 is $2.75/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
How can I compare Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Wonder on Rival?
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Wonder across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.
More comparisons
Against the newest arrivals
- Muse Spark 1.1 vs Gemini 4 ArgonLanded Oct 2026
- Muse Wonder vs GPT-4 TurboLanded Oct 2026
- Muse Spark 1.1 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
- Muse Wonder vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
- Muse Spark 1.1 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
- Muse Wonder vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
- Muse Spark 1.1 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
- Muse Wonder vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
Same lab, same size, long tail
- Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30BSame lab
- Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3Same lab
- Muse Wonder vs Muse Glimmer 30BSame lab
- Muse Wonder vs Muse Spark 1.3Same lab
- Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3 CoderNew provider
- Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3 Coder FlashNew provider
- Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3 Coder NextSame size
- Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3 Coder PlusSame size
