Claude Opus 4 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

Compare Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic against Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI, context windows of 200K vs 262K, tested across 29 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Claude Opus 4 and Google: Gemma 4 31B are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. Context windows: 200K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4 and Google: Gemma 4 31B

Claude Opus 4 is made by anthropic while Google: Gemma 4 31B is from google. Claude Opus 4 has a 200K token context window compared to Google: Gemma 4 31B's 262K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B.

Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4
Google: Gemma 4 31B
Google: Gemma 4 31B

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Google: Gemma 4 31B is 188x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

Claude Opus 4 uses 3.4x more sentence length

Claude Opus 4
Google: Gemma 4 31B
64%Vocabulary57%
62wSentence Length18w
0.52Hedging0.37
4.4Bold7.1
9.1Lists4.0
0.11Emoji0.24
1.87Headings0.94
0.27Transitions0.16
Based on 16 + 23 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Opus 4Google: Gemma 4 31B
FAQ