Claude Opus 4 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B
Compare Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic against Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI, in 2 community votes, claude opus 4 and google: gemma 4 31b are closely matched, context windows of 200K vs 262K, tested across 44 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or Google: Gemma 4 31B?
Claude Opus 4 and Google: Gemma 4 31B are closely matched based on 2 community votes. Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. Context windows: 200K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4 and Google: Gemma 4 31B
Claude Opus 4 is made by anthropic while Google: Gemma 4 31B is from google. Claude Opus 4 has a 200K token context window compared to Google: Gemma 4 31B's 262K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. In community voting, In 2 community votes, Claude Opus 4 and Google: Gemma 4 31B are closely matched.
In 2 community votes, Claude Opus 4 and Google: Gemma 4 31B are closely matched. Claude Opus 4 and Google: Gemma 4 31B perform similarly across challenge categories. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 2+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Per 1M tokens
Google: Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on both — 107× input, 188× output
Votes are tied. Google: Gemma 4 31B is newer and likely incorporates more recent improvements.
Google: Gemma 4 31B is 188x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Claude Opus 4 uses 3.4x more sentence length
