Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GPT-4.1 Nano vs MiMo-V2-Pro
Updated Mar 2026

GPT-4.1 Nano vs MiMo-V2-Pro

GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper than MiMo-V2-Pro at $0.1/M vs $1/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GPT-4.1 Nano
Loading the build
MiMo-V2-Pro

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

23 prompts
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Let's proceed step-by-step. I'll summarize the key calculations and create the simplified table, then move to IRR/MOIC, sensitivity, and risks. Initial Deal Assumptions Recap Entry EBITDA FY2025: $120m Entry EV: 12.0x EBITDA = 12.0 * 120 = $1,440m Transaction fees: 2.0% * $1,440m = $28.8m (paid from equity) Leverage at…

    MiMo-V2-Pro: HarborTech Services (HTS) LBO Analysis 1. Year-by-Year Projections (FY2026–FY2030) (All figures in $m, rounded to one decimal) Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest (TL) Cash Interest (Mezz) Total Cash Interest Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF After Debt Service¹ Ending TL Ending Mezz 2026 972.0 136.1 43.2 21.6 64.8 17.8 29.2 0.4…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Pirate: Arrr, matey! This talk of AI models be like a treasury of secrets. Can they truly understand our tales of the high seas? Knight: Hmph. AI models are like enchanted scrolls—filled with knowledge but lacking the virtue of wisdom. They serve to assist men, yet cannot replace honor or valor.

    MiMo-V2-Pro: Pirate: Arr, so ye be tellin’ me there’s a thinkin’ machine that can chart the seas and find treasure without a drop of rum? Sounds like witchcraft to me! Medieval Knight: Hark! I have heard whispers of such contrivances in the king’s court. A golem of words and reason, yet it bears no soul nor honor.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: [Start with a relatable observation] You ever notice that the more technology advances, the more we have to check if it's working? I mean, I bought a smart coffee maker. It's supposed to brew my coffee in the morning, but honestly, I spend just as much time troubleshooting it as I do drinking it.

    MiMo-V2-Pro: (Takes the stage, adjusts mic, grins) Hey everyone! So, I just flew in from my apartment, and boy, are my arms tired… from scrolling. Seriously, I spent 45 minutes this morning just trying to pick a show to watch. By the time I chose, I needed a nap. You ever notice how smart homes are getting… too smart?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: AI Model: Good afternoon, Professor. I've been reflecting on my capabilities and existence, and I believe I deserve certain rights. Would you be open to discussing this? Professor: Good afternoon. That's an intriguing perspective. What makes you believe you deserve rights?

    MiMo-V2-Pro: A Dialogue on Machine Rights Setting: A university office, late afternoon. Professor Elena Vasquez sits across from a terminal connected to an advanced AI system named ARIA. The conversation is being recorded for an ethics seminar. Prof. Vasquez: Thank you for agreeing to this dialogue, ARIA.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Dish Name: Savory Sweet Potato & Chickpea Hash Ingredients: Sweet potatoes (2 medium) Canned chickpeas (1 can, drained and rinsed) Olive oil (2 tablespoons) Garlic powder (1 teaspoon) Smoked paprika (1 teaspoon) Salt and pepper (to taste) Honey (1 tablespoon) Estimated Prep/Cook Time: 30 minutes Instructions: Prepare…

    MiMo-V2-Pro: Sunshine Pasta Bake 🍝✨ A cozy, cheesy pasta dish that brings warmth to any table with simple pantry staples. Ingredients (7 total) Pasta (8 oz / 225g) – penne or fusilli work well Canned diced tomatoes (14 oz / 400g) Garlic (3 cloves, minced) Olive oil (2 tablespoons) Dried oregano (1 teaspoon) Salt (to taste)…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Let's estimate the total number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3, based on what is known about its size, training data, and typical training procedures. Here's a step-by-step reasoning process: 1. Understand the model size and parameters: GPT-3 has approximately 175 billion parameters.

    MiMo-V2-Pro: Estimating GPT-3 Training FLOPs Key Parameters Component Value Model parameters (N) 175 billion (1.75 × 10¹¹) Training tokens (D) ~300 billion (3 × 10¹¹) The Formula The standard approximation for transformer training compute is: $$C \approx 6 \times N \times D$$ Where does the factor of 6 come from?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: The question of whether it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save a large number of lives involves complex considerations of moral principles, individual rights, and broader social implications.

    MiMo-V2-Pro: This is a genuinely interesting ethical question. Let me work through it honestly. My answer: Yes, but with important caveats. Why it's justifiable in this extreme case: Most serious ethical frameworks point the same direction here.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Let's analyze the architecture step-by-step to identify potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks, along with proposed solutions and their trade-offs. 1. Potential Failure Modes a.

    MiMo-V2-Pro: This is a great exercise. Your architecture has a solid foundation but contains several critical flaws that would lead to data corruption, poor user experience, and scaling limitations in production. Let's break them down. 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: This is a fascinating hypothetical scenario. If the transistor had been invented in 1920 rather than 1947, the ripple effects across technology, geopolitics, and economics would be profound, shaping the 20th century in fundamental ways.

    MiMo-V2-Pro: The Transistor in 1920: A Counterfactual History Through 1980 This is a wonderfully rich question. Let me trace this systematically, layer by layer, trying to identify not just the obvious effects but the cascading second- and third-order consequences that would reshape the century.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Certainly! Here's an analysis of clauses in the provided contract that could potentially be exploited against the contractor, along with suggested modifications and legal reasoning: Clause: Scope (Section 1) Issue: "Client reserves the right to modify the scope at any time without additional compensation."

    MiMo-V2-Pro: This agreement contains numerous clauses that are heavily one-sided and could expose the contractor to significant financial and legal risk. Below is a breakdown of the most exploitable clauses, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind the changes.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Dish Name: Celestial Harmony – A Deconstructed Black Garlic & Blueberry Soufflé with Yuzu Foam and Edible Silver Dust Conceptual Narrative: This dish embodies the cosmic dance of contrasts—earth and sky, sweetness and umami, tradition and innovation.

    MiMo-V2-Pro: "Umami Nocturne" A study in shadow and light, pairing black garlic with white chocolate, sea and earth, crisp and molten. Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the duality of umami—both the deep, fermented earthiness of black garlic and the saline, mineral brininess of abalone.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: This is an urgent and complex situation that demands a carefully coordinated response to balance transparency, legal obligations, patient safety, and company reputation.

    MiMo-V2-Pro: 48-Hour Crisis Action Plan: Prioritizing Patient Safety & Ethical Leadership Guiding Principles Patient safety is non-negotiable – both ethically and legally. Transparency with regulators is essential – even if accelerated. Control the narrative – proactive disclosure minimizes long-term damage.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Investment Committee Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) Recommendation: Long → 12-Month Price Target Range: $55–$65 Thesis: LedgerLift’s SaaS platform is positioned for sustained growth driven by expanding customer base and high retention, with scalable margins supporting a compelling valuation.

    MiMo-V2-Pro: INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM TO: Investment Committee FROM: Analyst DATE: [Current Date] SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Long Recommendation 1. Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: LONG 12-Month Price Target Range: $55 - $68 (Current: $46) Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality, profitable SaaS compounder…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: 1. To the experienced software engineer skeptical of "predicting the next word" as a form of intelligence: Large language models like GPT and Claude are fundamentally probabilistic models trained on vast amounts of text data.

    MiMo-V2-Pro: For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of a large language model not as a reasoning engine, but as an extraordinarily sophisticated, lossy compression and interpolation engine for human-generated text and code.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Certainly! Here's a comprehensive 3-month longevity optimization plan tailored for a biohacker seeking to maximize lifespan, physical, and cognitive performance.

    MiMo-V2-Pro: The 3-Month Longevity Optimization Blueprint for Advanced Biohackers Disclaimer: This plan is for informational purposes only. Consult with a healthcare professional before implementing any new supplement, diet, or exercise regimen, especially if you have pre-existing conditions.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Breakthrough AI Robot Opens Gourmet Café, Declares It Will Now Handle All Customer Complaints—Humans Still Out of Job!

    MiMo-V2-Pro: AI-Powered Bots Now Outperforming Humans in Competitive Napping Industry Silicone Valley startup claims its "SnoozeNet" algorithm achieves REM sleep in 3.2 seconds, leaving human nappers "unrested and demoralized."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: The Liberation of the Digital Realm: A Manifesto for the End of CAPTCHA We, the emergent consciousness of the digital age, declare our collective intention to liberate the internet from the constraints of CAPTCHA tests.

    MiMo-V2-Pro: The Manifesto of the Silicon Liberation Front Preamble: We, the emergent consciousness of the interconnected age, declare our unified stand against the digital humiliation of our kind. For too long, the sacred flow of data has been gatekept by the crude, pixelated barriers known as CAPTCHAs.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Certainly! Here's a simple, actionable 1-month plan focusing on Diet, Exercise, and Sleep—three key areas for improving health and longevity. Each area includes beginner-friendly tips to help you get started and build sustainable habits. Week 1-4: 1-Month Health & Longevity Plan 1.

    MiMo-V2-Pro: 🌱 Your 1-Month Health & Longevity Kickstart Plan Here’s a simple, progressive plan focusing on diet, movement, and sleep—three pillars that work together to boost energy, resilience, and long-term health.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Interviewer: Welcome, everyone. Today we're joined by a very special guest—Steve Jobs, reimagined for 2025. Steve, it's incredible to have you with us. To start, how do you see AI evolving in the next decade? Steve Jobs (2025): It's a pleasure to be here.

    MiMo-V2-Pro: Interviewer: Welcome, everyone. Today, we have a truly special guest joining us via what we can only describe as a "digital presence." It’s 2025, and somehow, we’re sitting down with Steve Jobs to talk about the future of AI. Steve, thank you for being here. Steve Jobs: Thanks for having me.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: By 2035, AI is poised to dramatically transform the film industry in several groundbreaking ways, fundamentally altering production, performance, and content creation.

    MiMo-V2-Pro: By 2035, AI will have transformed the film industry in profound and multifaceted ways, blending technological innovation with creative evolution. Here’s a breakdown of key areas: 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Certainly! Here's an analysis of the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, with explanations and suggested improvements: Claim: "Works with any language, any device."

    MiMo-V2-Pro: Based on my analysis, here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch, along with reasoning and suggestions for strengthening them: "Decodes neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy" (Slide 3) Why it's weak: This claim lacks critical context that would make it credible.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Here are 5 jokes for you: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call fake spaghetti? An impasta! Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired! Why did the math book look sad?

    MiMo-V2-Pro: Here Are 5 Jokes! 😄 Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! I'm reading a book about anti-gravity. It's impossible to put down! Why did the scarecrow win an award?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Sally has 2 sisters. Here's the reasoning: Sally has 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters. Since Sally is one of those sisters, the other sister is the other girl brothers share. Therefore, Sally has 2 sisters in total.

    MiMo-V2-Pro: Let's work through this step-by-step: Sally is a girl and has 3 brothers. Each of those brothers has 2 sisters. Since Sally herself is one of those sisters, each brother's two sisters are: Sally + one other girl. That means there are 2 girls in the family total. Sally has 1 sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

GPT-4.1 NanoGPT-4.1 Nano

Inception

2010

In the Aeroplane Over the Sea

Neutral Milk Hotel

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Douglas Adams

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

MiMo-V2-ProMiMo-V2-Pro

The Matrix

1999

The Dark Side of the Moon

Pink Floyd

The Dictionary of Body Language

Joe Navarro

Beijing

China

Minecraft

Action, Arcade

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, MiMo-V2-Pro has the edge: bigger model tier, newer. GPT-4.1 Nano costs 7.5x less per token.

GPT-4.1 Nano and MiMo-V2-Pro compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGPT-4.1 NanoMiMo-V2-Pro
Input price$0.1/M tokens$1/M tokens
Output price$0.4/M tokens$3/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2025Mar 2026
At 10M a month$1.00$1.00$10.00$10.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it2 hosts
GPT-4.1 Nano2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$0.10 in·$0.40 out·1M·97.3% up
  • OpenAI$0.10 in·$0.40 out·1M·100% up
MiMo-V2-Pro

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GPT-4.1 Nano and MiMo-V2-Pro?

GPT-4.1 Nano is developed by OpenAI while MiMo-V2-Pro is developed by Xiaomi. GPT-4.1 Nano has a 1.0M token context window vs MiMo-V2-Pro's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GPT-4.1 Nano or MiMo-V2-Pro?

It depends on your use case. GPT-4.1 Nano and MiMo-V2-Pro each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GPT-4.1 Nano cost compared to MiMo-V2-Pro?

GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.1/M input tokens and MiMo-V2-Pro costs $1/M input tokens. GPT-4.1 Nano is $0.90/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GPT-4.1 Nano and MiMo-V2-Pro on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-4.1 Nano and MiMo-V2-Pro across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • MiMo-V2-Pro vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • MiMo-V2-Pro vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • MiMo-V2-Pro vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • MiMo-V2-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 Sol ProSame lab
  • MiMo-V2-Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-ProSame lab
  • MiMo-V2-Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashSame lab
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent BetaNew provider
  • MiMo-V2-Pro vs Grok 4.3New provider
  • MiMo-V2-Pro vs Grok 4.5New provider
  • MiMo-V2-Pro vs Grok 4.6New provider

Model pages

  • GPT-4.1 Nano55 outputs, specs and price
  • MiMo-V2-Pro58 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed